Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/13/6491. ALICE DECUNHAW/O ROMEO DECUHA,ILLIKKAL HOUSE,ELAMKUNNAPUZHA-682 503...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE PRINCIPAL LOTUS BAUSCH & LOMB INSTITUTE OF OPTOMETRY583/33F TEJAS TOWER,S.A.ROAD,KADAVANTHR...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.Deepak Sabharwal & Associates. Mr. K. Rajeshwar Rao,
Respondant Advocate M/s. P. Ravi Teja
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/599/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/08/2012 in Case No. CC/296/2010 of District Hyderabad)1. Institute of Clinical Research ( India) Rep. by its Managing Director, Having its Hyderabad O...
Case Number: 599
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.Deepak Sabharwal & Associates Mr. K. Rajeshwar Rao
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/605/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/08/2012 in Case No. CC/282/2010 of District Hyderabad)1. Institute of Clinical Research ( India) Rep. by its Managing Director, Having its Hyderabad O...
Case Number: 605
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.Deepak Sabharwal & Associates Mr. K. Rajeshwar Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s. P. Ravi Teja
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/611/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/08/2012 in Case No. CC/276/2010 of District Hyderabad)1. Institute of Clinical Research ( India) Rep. by its Managing Director, Having its Hyderabad O...
Case Number: 611
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.Deepak Sabharwal & Associates Mr. K. Rajeshwar Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s. P. Ravi Teja
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/612/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/08/2012 in Case No. CC/298/2010 of District Hyderabad)1. Institute of Clinical Research ( India) Rep. by its Managing Director, Having its Hyderabad O...
Case Number: 612
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s.Deepak Sabharwal & Associates Mr. K. Rajeshwar Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s. P. Ravi Teja
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/617/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/08/2012 in Case No. CC/275/2010 of District Hyderabad)1. Institute of Clinical Research ( India) Rep. by its Managing Director, Having its Hyderabad O...
Case Number: 617
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Smt. Geeta Handra Khanuja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/15/20141. The Vice Chancellor, Birla Institute Pilani BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBERHON'ABLE MRS. PADMA PANDEY MEMBER PRESENT: ORDER            As...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR. MOHAN RAO
Respondant Advocate Mr.M.Chalapathi Rao - OP 1 to 4
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADComplaint Case No. CC/29/20121. 1. B.G. SREEDEVI, W/O LATE DR. B.G. SREEDHAR, AGED 40 YEARS,R/O H.NO. 51/15A-121-1, BABA BRINDAVAN NAGAR, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DIST.2. 2. B.G. RITEESH RAMA CHANDRA, S/O LATE ...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate KIRAN U. PATIL
Respondant Advocate H. D RATHOD
Complaint Case No. CC/29/20111. AMAR C. SARKARSECTOR 7 BLDG. 36 R/NO. 1334 CGS COLONY ANTOP HILL MUMBAI 37MAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE DEAN, ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATIONLALA LAPATARAI UDYAN K.K.RD. HAJI ALI MAHALAXMIMUMBAI 34MAHA...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P. VENKAT REDDY & MR. B. RAMANA MURTHY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2014 IN FA/191/20131. K. SANJEEV KUMAR @ KAMMA SANJEEVA RAO...........Appellants(s)Versus1. KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (KIMS) & 2 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.