Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
PRINCIPAL, GOVT. INSTITUTE & TRAINING & ANR. V/S SUSHMA SHRIVASTAV
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE
Respondant Advocate MR. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 718 OF 2013 IN RP/2066/20131. SUSHMA SHRIVASTAV...........Appellants(s)Versus1. PRINCIPAL, GOVT. INSTITUTE & TRAINING & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDH...
Case Number: 718
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2014
SEHGAL NURSING HOME AND NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND ORS. V/S WASIM UR RAHMAN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. CHARU SINGHAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 76 OF 2014 IN CC/87/20101. WASIM UR RAHMAN...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SEHGAL NURSING HOME AND NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUST...
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2014
THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PLANING V/S AKSHAY
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI CONVIENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, SAINI ENCLAVE: DELHI-92CASE NO-133/14 Sh. Akshay Goyal,S/oSh. Vijay Kr. GpyalR/o E-7A/5, Krishan NagarDelhi-110051 ComplainantVsThe Indian Institute of Plan...
Case Number: 133
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2016
I.A.N.T INSTITUTE OF ADVANCE NETWORK TECHNOLOGY V/S SHEKH MAHMADSHAAD MAHMADHUSEN
Court Name: Sabar kantha
Appelant Advocate M.H.SUTHARIYA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-08-2020
ANUNAYA KULSHRESHTHA & ANR. V/S INDORE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1823 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 03/10/2011 in Appeal No. 1844/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh) WITH IA/157/2014,IA/2930/2013,IA/2931/20131. INDORE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTEM-4-6 MISICA TOW...
Case Number: 1823
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-02-2014
Tirpude Institute of Management Education V/S Shri Santosh Kishor Anand
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv Pravin Dahat
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Execution Application No. EA/12/1121. Shri Santosh Kishor AnandPlot No. 63, Baba Budhaji Nagar, Teka Naka, NagpurNagpurM S...........Appellant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
NAGAJI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT V/S SANDEEP VERMA
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 483
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2016
MEDICAPS INSTITUTE V/S MITENDRA SINGH
Court Name: Mandsaur
Appelant Advocate NARENDRA HINDAL
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-04-2016
Sri Sukhmani Institute V/S Rishabh Garg
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 86 of 2013 1. Rishabh Garg ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 29 Apr 2013 ORDER BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUM...
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1.Frankfinn Institute Of Air Hostess Training through Managing Director, Mr. Kohli V/S Mr. Mukesh Dilipkumar Kundnani
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate J. S. Kulkarni
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/951. Mr. Mukesh Dilipkumar KundnaniR/at. Sai Enclave,wing H Flat No. 7B Near Nirankari Satsang Hall,Kalewadi Pimpri ,Pune-411017Maharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1.Frankfinn Institute Of Air Hostess Training through Managing Director, Mr. Kohli...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.