Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
Binay Bhattacharyya V/S The Proprietor, Gandhi Institute of Management & Technology
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Rajesh Biswas Mr. Sibaji Sankar dhar
Respondant Advocate In-Person
Case Number: 89
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 31-07-2023
Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology & Sciences, Sangivalasa - 531162, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Vis V/S Mokari Vamshi, S/o. Mokari Venkati, R/o. Rotary Nagar, Khammam town and District
Court Name: Khammam
Appelant Advocate Paladugu Venkateswarlu, Advocate
Respondant Advocate Sri Kolli Satyanarayana
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2019
PRASHANT KUMAR & ANR. V/S INDORE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 195 OF 2014 IN RP/1824/20131. INDORE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE...........Appellants(s)Versus1. PRASHANT KUMAR & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PRESIDIN...
Case Number: 195
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2014
PRASHANT KUMAR & ANR. V/S INDORE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1824 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/11/2011 in Appeal No. 1860/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. INDORE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTEM-4-6 MISICA TOWER, ABOVE ICICI ATM, FRONT OF SAPNA SANGITA,...
Case Number: 1824
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2014
Bharat Institute of Technology & Science for women, Represented by its Principal Mangalpalli (V) Ibr V/S P.alekhya D/o. P.Narsimhulu, Aged about 20 years, Occ: Student, R/o. H.No.42-27, Gayathri Nagar, Moula Ali, Hyderabad.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. M.Rathan singh
Respondant Advocate M/s. Surender Rao
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/507/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/05/2013 in Case No. CC/176/2012 of District Rangareddi)1. P.alekhya D/o. P.Narsimhulu, Aged about 20 years, Occ: Student, R/o. H.No.42-27, Gayathri Na...
Case Number: 507
|
Date of Filing: 03-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Indu Sharma V/S Shri krishna group of institute
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sarvesh pandey
Respondant Advocate -
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2014/672(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Shri krishna group of institute- BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Virend...
Case Number: 2014
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
OPERATOR SHRI KEDAR INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY V/S AUGUST MUNI CHATURVEDI
Court Name: Rewa
Appelant Advocate SANJAY TIWARI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2016
INDORE MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE V/S MOHD. RAFAT KHAN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. V.K. SAXENA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3654 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 29/06/2013 in Appeal No. 1410/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. MOHD. RAFAT KHANS/O ABDUL WAHAB KHAN, R/O WARD NO-8, LOHARI GALI,BALAGHAT, DISTRICT : B...
Case Number: 3654
|
Date of Filing: 11-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-04-2014
THE DIRECTOR,KEY INSTITUTE V/S DILEEP.A
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/147/20131. DILEEP.AGODS GRACEVILLA HOUSE No.EWS52 SASTHRI NAGAR HOUSING COLONY ERANHIPALAM.P.O 673006...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE DIRECTOR,KEY INSTITUTEERNAKULAM-ALUVA ROAD Near.KALLUR BUSSTAND KALLUR.P.O-6820172. KEY INSTITUTENear RADHA THEATRE,COU...
Case Number: 147
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MAHARANAN PRATAP INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING V/S KULDEEP DUBEY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SH ARUN KU. JAIN
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2008
|
Date of Upload: 13-10-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.