Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3804 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
ANAMIKA SINGH V/S REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PANKAJ CHANDGOTHIA
Respondant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 655-656 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/10/2013 in Appeal No. 394/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENTSECTOR-32-C, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, CHANDIGARH...
Case Number: 655
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2014
NISHA V/S REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF COOPERSTIVE MANAGEMENT
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PANKAJ CHANDGOTHIA
Respondant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 657-658 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/10/2013 in Appeal No. 344&393/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF COOPERSTIVE MANAGEMENTSECTOR-32-C, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, CHANDI...
Case Number: 657
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2014
AARIF FARIDI V/S REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PANKAJ CHANDGOTHIA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 659-660 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 01/10/2013 in Appeal No. 363&394/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENTSECTOR-32-C, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR,CHANDIG...
Case Number: 659
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2014
AXIS BANK & 3 ORS. V/S SHARDA INSTITUTE OF INDIAN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PEEYOOSH KALRA & MR. SUDHINDRA TRIPATHI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 580 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 31/07/2013 in Complaint No. 187/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SHARDA INSTITUTE OF INDIAN MANAGEMENT RESEARCHTHROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, 7, INSTITUTIONAL ARE...
Case Number: 580
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2014
POst Graduate Institute Of Medical Education V/S Mandeep Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Mandeep kaur Adv.
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/76/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Mandeep KaurChd............Appellant(s)Versus1. POst Graduate Institute Of Medical Education& Research (PGIMER), Sector-12, Chandigarh through its Director2. Dr. A. Behra Head of Department of ...
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Sh. Rishabh Garg V/S Sri. Sukhmani Institute of Engineering & Technology
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Subash Karkra Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sharas Aggarwal, Adv.
First Appeal No. FA/88/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Sri. Sukhmani Institute of Engineering & TechnologyChd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Sh. Rishabh GargS/o Sh. Rakesh Garg R/o House No. 1117/B, Near Kesho Ram Vaid, Ward No.7, Derabassi..........
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 1344
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2016
LT. COL. (RETD.) ZILE SINGH DAHIYA V/S RAJIV GANDHI CANCER INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. KARUNA NUNDY
Respondant Advocate DR. SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 251 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 17/04/2008 in Complaint No. C-108/2001 of the State Commission Delhi)1. RAJIV GANDHI CANCER INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRESector-V, RohiniNew DelhiDelhi2. Dr. Y.P. Bhatia ...
Case Number: 251
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2014
MEDICAPS INSTITUTE OF TECHNO V/S SATISH JARIYA
Court Name: Indore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 841
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2016
INDIAN LAW INSTITUTE COOPERATIVE V/S SUSHIL KUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUSHIL KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MS. MADHU TEWATIA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 57 OF 20051. SUSHIL KUMARSENIOR ADVOCATE, SUPREME COURT, A-31, LAW APARTMENT VIKAS MARG,DELHI -92...........Complainant(s)Versus1. INDIAN LAW INSTITUTE COOPERATIVE THROUGH PRESIDENT/SECRETARY, GROUP HOUSIN...
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 21-06-2005
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.