Institute
Latest Judgments
Total 3788 Consumer Court Cases Against Institute.
K M RAHUL V/S PRINCIPAL VEDA VYASA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate C S RAJMOHAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONTHIRUVANANTHAPURAMFirst Appeal No. A/16/704( Date of Filing : 01 Nov 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/07/2016 in Case No. CC/430/2014 of District Malappuram)1. PRINCIPAL VEDA VYASA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYKARADPRAMB PO MALAPPURAM PIN ...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2024
Parry Sales Corporation V/S Synthesis Institute Manoj Bajaj
Court Name: Bikaner
Appelant Advocate Aanand Bajaj
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2024
|
Date of Upload: 24-10-2024
M/S KETKI RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES LTD., V/S DR. RAJKUMAR S/O. MOHANLAL RATHI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV. ANIL H. LADDHAD
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 22-10-2024
KHUSRO INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY V/S NETRAPAL SINGH
Court Name: Bareilly-II
Appelant Advocate DHARA SINGH
Respondant Advocate
1. परिवादी द्वारा अधिवक्ता श्री धारा सिंह। 2. पंजीयन पत्र पर तर्क सुने। 3. परिवादी पत्र प्रथम दृष्टतया समय अवध...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2024
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2024
M/s. L.V. Prasad Eye Institute V/S Myana Narayana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. Porandla Sridhar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 792
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2019
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2024
Saroj Institute of Technology & Management V/S Vipin Srivastava
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Satish Chandra Srivastava & Ashish Srivastava
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1057/2024( Date of Filing : 26 Jul 2024 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/04/2023 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/135/2014 of District Lucknow-II)1...
Case Number: 1057
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2024
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2024
Akash Institute V/S Manan
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Ajay Sehra
Respondant Advocate Dheeraj Sachdeva
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No.262 of 2024 Date of instt.27.05.2024 Date of Decision:15.10.2024Manan (minor) aged 1 years through guardian Shri Ravi Gulati (father), resident of H.No.214, Dharamveer Colony, Gharaunda, Karnal.&h...
Case Number: 262
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2024
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2024
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PLAINANING MANAGMENT V/S ABHAY AGGARWAL
Court Name: South Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II UDYOG SADAN C 22 23QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016Complaint Case No. CC/113/2015( Date of Filing : 30 Apr 2015 )1. ABHAY AGGARWALRO 187 A CARRIAPPA MARG SAINIK FARM NEW DELHI 110062...........Complai...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2024
Shalini Singh V/S Indian Institute
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S K Sharma
Respondant Advocate Prashant Kumar
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/1991( Date of Filing : 20 Oct 2008 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Indian Institutea...........Appell...
Case Number: 2008
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2024
Allen Digital Allen Career Institute Pvt. Ltd. V/S Dr. Saurabh Garg S/o Raj Kumar
Allen Career Institute Institute
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Vikas Aggarwal
Respondant Advocate GS Reen OP No.1&2, KK Gupta OP No.3
CC No.371 of 2023.Dr. Saurabh Garg Vs. Allen Digital.Present: Sh. Vikas Aggarwal, Adv. for the complainant. Sh. GS Reen, Adv. for the opponent No.1 and 2. Sh. KK Gupta, Adv. for the opponent No.3. Keeping in view of even dated separate statement suffered by t...
Case Number: 371
|
Date of Filing: 05-10-2023
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2024
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Institute in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Institute ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Institute under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.