Court Name: Tiruchirapplli
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAUTAM BANK AWASTHI & MR. NIKHIL JAIN
Respondant Advocate M/S. LEMAX LAWYERS & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1583 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/01/2013 in Appeal No. 1027/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/2760/2013,IA/2761/20131. INDIAN BANKNERUL BRANCH VEDAPATHASHLA BUILDING, SIES COMPOU...
Case Number: 1583
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2014
Court Name: Additional DCF, Pune
Appelant Advocate F.M. Oswal
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/1221. Dr. Kantilal Keshrimal Punmia936,New Nana Peth,Quarter Gate,Pune 411 002PuneMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Indian BankPune Camp Branch,South Wing,35,Arora Towers,M.G.Road,Pune-411 001PuneMaharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: Smt....
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. J.Srinivas Reddy
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/844/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/08/2013 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/228/2013 of District Hyderabad-II)1. G.S.R. Deekshitulu S/o. G.L.N. Sastry, Aged about 58 Years, Occ: Advoca...
Case Number: 844
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Indian Bank South Indian Bank South Indian Bank
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/13/2181. CLYDESON REBELLOWTHARAYIL BUNGLOW(PALLEKKATTU) VALLARPADAM,PIN-682 504,ERNAKULAM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S SOUTH INDIAN BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGERHEAD OFFICE,SAKTHAN THAMPU...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. B. KARUNAKARAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3892 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 14/02/2011 in Appeal No. 1838/2010 & 1335/2010 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu) WITH IA/6937/2013,IA/6938/2013,IA/6939/20131. INDIAN BANKREPRESENTED BY ITS SENI...
Case Number: 3892
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate WILLIAMS
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/13/236(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/01/2013 in Case No. 291/2012 of District Idukki)1. THE BRANCH MANAGER, SOUTH INDIAN BANKMURICKASSERY BRANCH, IDUKKI...........Appellant(s)Versu...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 23-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Provident Fund Provident Fund Indian Bank
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. K. Rama Koteswara Rao
Respondant Advocate
FA No: 528 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/05/2013 in Case No. CC/152/2012 of District Guntur)1. D.V. Hanumantha Rao, S/o. D.L. Narasimha Rao Aged 63 Yrs, Occ: Retired cleaner of APSRTC Repalle Depot,Guntur District, R/o. D.No.12-18-16, Agraharam, vinayaka Temple Street, Rep...
Case Number: 556
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Provident Fund Provident Fund Indian Bank Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. K. Raghuram Reddy
Respondant Advocate
FA No: 721 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/05/2013 in Case No. CC/152/2012 of District Guntur)1. 1. The Regional, Provident Fund Commissioner Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, Barkatpura, Hyderbad. Rep. by its Asst. P.F. Commission (Legal), Mr. PDLNV Prasada Rao.2. No RespondentNo Res...
Case Number: 744
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Alappuzha
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ALAPPUZHAComplaint Case No. CC/31/20131. KunjammaW/o S.J. James, Sasthamparambil, Punnapra P.O. - 688 004AlappuzhaKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager,South Indian Bank ltdAlappuzha, Near Municipal OfficeAlappuzha............Op...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Indian Bank in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Indian Bank ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Indian Bank under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.