company-name-logo

Iffco Tokio General Insurance

Latest Judgments

Total 2394 Consumer Court Cases Against Iffco Tokio General Insurance.

Chhattisgarh

Janak Lal Sahu V/S IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Company

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Rajnandgaon

Appelant Advocate Shri D K Jain

Respondant Advocate Shri Prashant Vaishnav

Case Number: 24

|

Date of Filing: 03-04-2024

|

Date of Upload: 08-04-2024

Haryana

IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd V/S Om Parkash Yadav

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Gurgaon

Appelant Advocate Sh. Naveen Kumar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 60

|

Date of Filing: 27-01-2020

|

Date of Upload: 05-04-2024

Haryana

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED V/S MEENA

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Palwal

Appelant Advocate SHOBHIT BANSAL

Respondant Advocate AUTH. REP.

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 05-04-2024

Haryana

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited V/S Hawa Singh

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Dinesh Chauhan

Respondant Advocate Naveen Khettarpal

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 663 of 2022 Date of instt.22.11.2022 Date of Decision:03.04.2024Hawa Singh aged about 56 years son of Shri Mula Ram, resident of village Sheikhpura Sohana, District Karnal. Aadhar no.9550 0086 5462...

Case Number: 663

|

Date of Filing: 22-11-2022

|

Date of Upload: 05-04-2024

Chandigarh

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY THROUGH ITS OFFICE INCHARGE V/S ARVIND KUMAR UPADHYAY AGE ABOUT 43 YEARS SON OF KAILASH BIHARI UPADHYAY

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate DEEPIKA CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:CC/921/2022Date of Institution:11/11/2022Date of Decision:02/04/2024Arvind Kumar Upadhyay, aged about 43 years, son of Kailash Bihari Upadhyay, Resident of House No.172, Street No.6, Jujhar Na...

Case Number: 921

|

Date of Filing: 11-11-2022

|

Date of Upload: 02-04-2024

Maharashtra

IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co V/S Vitthal Narayan Gaikwad

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Nashik

Appelant Advocate Jitendra Bhaskar Kadam

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 09-01-2023

|

Date of Upload: 16-04-2024

Haryana

Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited, V/S Sanjiv Kumar

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Jhajjar

Appelant Advocate Complainant in person

Respondant Advocate Sh. Narender Kharab

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 13-06-2022

|

Date of Upload: 22-04-2024

Maharashtra

IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co V/S Vitthal Narayan Gaikwad

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: Nashik

Appelant Advocate Jitendra Bhaskar Kadam

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 09-01-2023

|

Date of Upload: 16-04-2024

Gujarat

Case Number: 854

|

Date of Filing: 29-11-2023

|

Date of Upload: 30-03-2024

NCDRC

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED V/S HARI RAM

Iffco Tokio General Insurance   General Insurance  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. MADHURIMA TATIA & MR. RAJENDRA TATIA

Respondant Advocate M/S. GNR LAW ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 425 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 13/01/2022 in Appeal No. 129/2021 of the State Commission Rajasthan) 1. HARI RAM ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED.........

Case Number: 425

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2022

|

Date of Upload: 28-03-2024

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Iffco Tokio General Insurance in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Iffco Tokio General Insurance ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Iffco Tokio General Insurance under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.