Idea
Latest Judgments
Total 1053 Consumer Court Cases Against Idea.
M/s Idea Cellular Ltd. V/S Charanjit Kaur
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vivek Mohan Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:567 of 2014Date of Institution:5.11.2014Date of Decision:15.02.2016Charanjit Kaur d/o Sh. Manohar Singh resident of House No.380/1, Sector 41A, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersusM/s Ide...
Case Number: 567
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2016
Idea Cellular V/S Sudhir Kumar
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Vishal Sharma,Adv
Respondant Advocate ut
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:61 of 2015Date of Institution:5/2/2015Date of Decision:11.2.20161. Sh. Sudhir Kumar Batish S/o Sh. S.P. Batish and2. Ms. Shreya Batish D/o Sh. S.K. Batish. Both r/o of House No.130, Sector 1...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2016
Idea V/S AMEEN SHEKHA
Court Name: East Nimar
Appelant Advocate Smt. Ishwari Pandey
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 78
|
Date of Filing: 13-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2016
Idea Cellular Ltd. V/S Anitta Mendonca
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
D.o.F:05/01/2016D.o.O:05/02/2016IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD CC.NO.8/16 Dated this, the 5th day of February 2016PRESENT:SMT.P.RAMADEVI : PRESIDENTSMT.BEENA K.G : MEMBERSMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL : MEMBERAnitta MendocaStylo apartment, : ComplainantMaipady Road ,U...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 05-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2016
Idea Office V/S Nanak Singh
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/15/5821. Nanak SinghVillage LAkhe Dariya near Peer Baba Bohar Singh, PO Jagdev Khurd Teh. Ajnala, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2016
The Manager/Shop In Charge, Idea Cellular Ltd, VJ Tower, Vyttila Post, Ernakulam-682019. V/S Haridasan.M, S/o Vasudevan Nair, Kalathil House, Kottathara Post, Kalpetta Via, Wayanad-673122
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION ,KALPETTAWAYANAD-673122PHONE 04936-202755Complaint Case No. CC/347/20151. Haridasan.M, S/o Vasudevan Nair, Kalathil House, Kottathara Post, Kalpetta Via, Wayanad-673122KalpettaWayanadKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manage...
Case Number: 347
|
Date of Filing: 25-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2016
Idea Cel. Ltd. V/S 564/2015 Yaman Chamriya
Court Name: Ganganagar
Appelant Advocate Mahadev Middha
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2016
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2016
M/S IDEA SELOUR LTD AND OTHERS V/S VISHNU DATT SHARMA
Court Name: Agra-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM II AGRACOLLECTORATE CAMPUS AGRAExecution Application No. EX95/2009InCC43/20091. VISHNU DATT SHARMA 38 AJANTA COLONY AGRA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S IDEA SELOUR LTD AND OTHERSSUMAN TOWAR PLOAT NO 18 SECTOR 11 GANDHINAGAR.............
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2016
JONAL BUSSIENS MANJER IDEA V/S PROMOD KUMAR
Court Name: Mathura
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer ForumMathuraUttar PradeshComplaint Case No. CC/67/20151. PROMOD KUMARMATHURA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. JONAL BUSSIENS MANJER IDEAMATHURA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RADHY SHYAM SINGH PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. RAMBABU KEWAT MEMBER For the Complai...
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Idea in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Idea ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Idea under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.