Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SULABH SAMAIYA
Respondant Advocate MR. JOY BASU
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 15 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/10/2011 in Appeal No. 664/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. RAJNU (CHHEDHI)S/o Shree munda, Add Village Kathotiya Tehsil: SuhagpurShahdolM.P.............
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SULABH SAMAIYA
Respondant Advocate MR. JOY BASU
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 15 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/10/2011 in Appeal No. 664/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. RAJNU (CHHEDHI)S/o Shree munda, Add Village Kathotiya Tehsil: SuhagpurShahdolM.P.............
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SULABH SAMAIYA
Respondant Advocate MR. JOY BASU
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 15 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/10/2011 in Appeal No. 664/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. RAJNU (CHHEDHI)S/o Shree munda, Add Village Kathotiya Tehsil: SuhagpurShahdolM.P.............
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SULABH SAMAIYA
Respondant Advocate MR. JOY BASU
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 15 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/10/2011 in Appeal No. 664/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. RAJNU (CHHEDHI)S/o Shree munda, Add Village Kathotiya Tehsil: SuhagpurShahdolM.P.............
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SULABH SAMAIYA
Respondant Advocate MR. JOY BASU
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 15 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/10/2011 in Appeal No. 664/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. RAJNU (CHHEDHI)S/o Shree munda, Add Village Kathotiya Tehsil: SuhagpurShahdolM.P.............
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SULABH SAMAIYA
Respondant Advocate MR. JOY BASU
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 15 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/10/2011 in Appeal No. 664/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. RAJNU (CHHEDHI)S/o Shree munda, Add Village Kathotiya Tehsil: SuhagpurShahdolM.P.............
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SULABH SAMAIYA
Respondant Advocate MR. JOY BASU
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 15 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/10/2011 in Appeal No. 664/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. RAJNU (CHHEDHI)S/o Shree munda, Add Village Kathotiya Tehsil: SuhagpurShahdolM.P.............
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-05-2012
Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate M.J.PARIKH
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2020
Icici Lombard Insurance Icici Lombard
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. A.P.Dande
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/10/7191. Jagdish Laxman Sawarkar274, Hingna, Dist. NagpurNagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ICICI Lombard Insurance...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 22-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Icici Lombard General Insurance Icici Lombard General Insurance
Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum
Appelant Advocate Mr. D.N. Ojha
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/44/2011( Date of Filing : 04 May 2011 )1. Ram Charan Cross Road No-13 , Qr.no -17/LA , Agrico , P.O & P.S. Sidhgora , Jamshedpur Purbi SinghbhumJharkhand...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager Legal , ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co....
Case Number: 44
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2019
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Icici Lombard in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Icici Lombard ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Icici Lombard under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.