company-name-logo

Hp

Latest Judgments

Total 380 Consumer Court Cases Against Hp.

Telangana

M.GOPAL, SRINIVASA ENTERPRISES , HP GAS DELAR V/S SRI M.HANMANTHU

Hp  

Court Name: Medak

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 116

|

Date of Filing: 06-08-1997

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2020

Telangana

SRINIVASA ENTERPRISES , HP GAS DELAR V/S K.RAMESH

Hp  

Court Name: Medak

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 141

|

Date of Filing: 04-09-1996

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2020

Gujarat

HP India Ltd. V/S Ghanshyambhai Mohanbhai

Hp  

Court Name: Amreli

Appelant Advocate Suryakantbhai

Respondant Advocate Makani

Case Number: 96

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-1996

|

Date of Upload: 20-12-2019

Karnataka

M/S. KRISHNA VASISHTA AGENCIES, HP GAS DEALER V/S K.RAMESH

Hp  

Court Name: Tumkur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 362

|

Date of Filing: 28-11-1994

|

Date of Upload: 09-10-2019

Karnataka

Deepak Leasing & Finance Corporation Regh V/S HP Rajlaxmi H Porushotamreddy

Finance   Finance   Hp  

Court Name: Bidar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 70

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-1992

|

Date of Upload: 30-07-2021

Karnataka

1. M/s. Aradhya Agencies, HP Gas Dealer, KR Extension Tumkur 2. The Manager LPG customer Servic V/S Prakash S/o. Munivenkatappa Res. At Basavashree Ashok nagar,

Hp  

Court Name: Tumkur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

TUMKUR DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMOld D.C.Office Compound,Tumkur-572 101.Complaint Case No. CC/60/1992( Date of Filing : 15 Jun 1992 )1. Prakash S/o. Munivenkatappa Res. At Basavashree Ashok nagar,TUMAKURU...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. M/s. Aradhya Agencies, ...

Case Number: 60

|

Date of Filing: 15-06-1992

|

Date of Upload: 18-09-2019

Karnataka

1. M/s. Aradhya Agencies, HP Gas Dealer, KR Extension Tumkur 2. The Manager LPG customer Service V/S Smt.H.S.Ushadevi W/o. Dr.H.N.Shivakumar Behind Parameswarara Nilaya, 3rd Cross, Siddaganga Extn.

Hp  

Court Name: Tumkur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

TUMKUR DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMOld D.C.Office Compound,Tumkur-572 101.Complaint Case No. CC/61/1992( Date of Filing : 15 Jun 1992 )1. Smt.H.S.Ushadevi W/o. Dr.H.N.Shivakumar Behind Parameswarara Nilaya, 3rd Cross, Siddaganga Extn.TUMAKURU...........Complainant(s...

Case Number: 61

|

Date of Filing: 15-06-1992

|

Date of Upload: 18-09-2019

Karnataka

Sri.T.P.Padmanabha Saptagiri Behind TGMC Bank, Vinayakanagar, Tumakuru V/S Aradhya Agencies HP Gas Dealer, 3rd Cross, KR Estn Tumakuru

Hp  

Court Name: Tumkur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

TUMKUR DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMOld D.C.Office Compound,Tumkur-572 101.Complaint Case No. CC/21/1992( Date of Filing : 06 Apr 1992 )1. Aradhya Agencies HP Gas Dealer, 3rd Cross, KR Estn TumakuruTUMAKURU...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sri.T.P.Padmanabha Saptagir...

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 06-04-1992

|

Date of Upload: 17-09-2019

Karnataka

Aradhya Agence, HP Gas Dealer V/S K.S.Bhat Sri Ranga

Hp  

Court Name: Tumkur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

TUMKUR DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMOld D.C.Office Compound,Tumkur-572 101.Complaint Case No. CC/32/1992( Date of Filing : 08 May 1992 )1. K.S.Bhat Sri RangaSiddalinganapalya Bangalore gate Tumkuru...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Aradhya Agence, HP Gas Dealer3rd Cro...

Case Number: 32

|

Date of Filing: 08-05-1992

|

Date of Upload: 18-09-2019

Karnataka

Aradhya Agence, HP Gas Dealer, 3rd Cross,. KR Extn. Tumkuru V/S M.S.Siddappa Aradhya Patel's Lingappa Compound Near Railway Station

Hp   Railway  

Court Name: Tumkur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

TUMKUR DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMOld D.C.Office Compound,Tumkur-572 101.Complaint Case No. CC/16/1992( Date of Filing : 03 Apr 1992 )1. M.S.Siddappa Aradhya Patel's Lingappa Compound Near Railway StationKyatasandra, Tumkur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Aradhya ...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 03-04-1992

|

Date of Upload: 17-09-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Hp in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Hp ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Hp under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.