Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S. CHANDRA SHEKHAR
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 9 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 09/12/2007 in Appeal No. 184/2002 of the State Commission Bihar)1. BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARDTHROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 6, MANGLES ROAD, PATNA, BIHAR...........Peti...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2012
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate Narayanan
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/09/761. S.R.SudhaFlat no. 106,FF 3 (a)-106, swathy nagar, west fort tvpmKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. kerala state housing boardsecretary KSHB, tvpmKerala2. Regional...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK GUPTA & PURUSHOTTAM S.T.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2782 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/03/2011 in Appeal No. 1423/2008 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ORS.Through Estate Manager, Rajasthan Hosuing Board, Mahakavi Tuls...
Case Number: 2782
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV KUMAR VARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1043 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/01/2012 in Appeal No. 58/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. URMILA YADAVW/o Sh Darshan Singh Yadav, R/o Village Meerpur, Post jigni Tehsil MorenaM.P....
Case Number: 1043
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV KUMAR VARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1043 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/01/2012 in Appeal No. 58/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. URMILA YADAVW/o Sh Darshan Singh Yadav, R/o Village Meerpur, Post jigni Tehsil MorenaM.P....
Case Number: 1044
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 368 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/05/2011 in Appeal No. 1960/2007 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ORS.Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Through its Chairman, Rajasthan Hosuing Bo...
Case Number: 368
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BADRIDAS SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MS. SHOBHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 195 OF 2012 IN FA/630/20061. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SUBHASH CHANDRA UPADHYAYA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. B. GUPTA, PRESIDING ME...
Case Number: 195
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2012
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhMISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 36 of 2012 1. Charanjit Singh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Chandigarh Housing Board Sector-9 Chandigarh through its Chairman ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 3...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhMISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 37 of 2012 1. Sushil Syan ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Chandigarh Housing Board Sector-9 Chandigarh through its Chairman ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 30 Ma...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Housing Board in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Housing Board ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Housing Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.