Housing Board
Latest Judgments
Total 3922 Consumer Court Cases Against Housing Board.
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2016
COMMISNER M.P. HOUSING BOARD V/S DEVMONEY BANSAL
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 119
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2016
PRESIDENT DIST REWA MP GOV AND OFFICER MP HOUSING BOARD OFFICE REWA V/S TALAT MAHMOOD
Court Name: Rewa
Appelant Advocate SATISH SINGH
Respondant Advocate SUKHENDRA SHUKLA
Case Number: 28
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2017
KANTA DEVI PATNI V/S RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 291 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/09/2011 in Appeal No. 1684/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.Mansarovar , Through its ManagerJaipur Rajasthan2. Rajasthan Ho...
Case Number: 291
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2012
DEVANAND & ANR. V/S EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.P. HOUSING BOARD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.M. KHIRWADKAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1147 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1628/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.P. HOUSING BOARDDivisional Office DharM.P...........Petitioner(s)...
Case Number: 1147
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2012
PRERANA JOSHI V/S EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.P. HOUSING BOARD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.M. KHIRWADKAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1147 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1628/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.P. HOUSING BOARDDivisional Office DharM.P...........Petitioner(s)...
Case Number: 1148
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2012
ASAT KHAN & ANR. V/S EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.P. HOUSING BOARD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.M. KHIRWADKAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1147 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1628/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.P. HOUSING BOARDDivisional Office DharM.P...........Petitioner(s)...
Case Number: 1149
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2012
CHAIRMAN, RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ORS. V/S DR. VEENA SINGHAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.K. BHATTACHARYA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 471 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 22/09/2011 in Complaint No. 68/2010 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. DR. VEENA SINGHALW/o Dr. Brijendre Singhal, R/o 152/11, Shipra Path, Mansarovar, JaipurRajasthan....
Case Number: 471
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2012
URMILA & ORS. V/S CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate MR. N.P. SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3654 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 26/08/2011 in Appeal No. 288/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARDSector-9-D, Through its SecretaryChandigarhChandigarh...........Peti...
Case Number: 3654
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2012
CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD & ORS. V/S URMILA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. N.P. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3920 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 26/08/2011 in Appeal No. 288/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. URMILAW/o Shri SK Rohilla, R/o No-69 sector-10PanchkulaHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus...
Case Number: 3920
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-05-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Housing Board in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Housing Board ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Housing Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.