company-name-logo

Housing Board

Latest Judgments

Total 3922 Consumer Court Cases Against Housing Board.

Madhya Pradesh

M.P.GRAH HOUSING BOARD V/S D.R.VYAS

Housing Board  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 686

|

Date of Filing: 06-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

M.P.GRAH HOUSING BOARD V/S D.R.VYAS

Housing Board  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 687

|

Date of Filing: 06-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2016

NCDRC

DAMODAR LAL GARG V/S RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ORS.

Housing Board  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR

Respondant Advocate ADV DEVENDRA MOHAN MATHUR & ASS

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2643 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/05/2011 in Appeal No. 1093/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ORS.Jyoti Nagar, Near Vidhan SabhaJaipurRajasthan2. Assitant Housi...

Case Number: 2643

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 11-02-2013

Madhya Pradesh

M P HOUSING BOARD V/S JEETENDRA THAKUR

Housing Board  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate DEEPESH JOSHI ADV

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 04-09-2009

|

Date of Upload: 05-12-2020

Chandigarh

Amit Roy V/S The Chandigarh Housing Board

Housing Board  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh.Vikas Jain, Adv. for the appellant

Respondant Advocate Ms. Tejinder Kaur Johal, Adv. for the respondent

First Appeal No. FA/383/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. The Chandigarh Housing BoardSector-9, Chandigarh thorugh its Chairman...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Amit Royson of Sh. Surinder Kumar Aged 33, Resident of 2621 Sector-40/C, Chandigarh...........

Case Number: 383

|

Date of Filing: 21-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

PRAMOD KHANDELWAL V/S M P HOUSING BOARD

Housing Board  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SH

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 03-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-03-2016

NCDRC

BRIJ BHUSHAN GUPTA V/S COMMISSIONER RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.

Housing Board  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2241 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 22/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1039/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. COMMISSIONER RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR.Jyoti NagarJaipurRajasthan2. Dy Commissoner Rajas...

Case Number: 2241

|

Date of Filing: 08-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2013

NCDRC

M.P. HOUSING BOARD V/S SURESH SHARMA

Housing Board  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE & MR. PAWAN KUMAR RAY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3979 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 06/07/2012 in Appeal No. 496/2008 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. SURESH SHARMAR/o House No-F-L 777,Sector-F Deendayal NagarGWALIORM.P...........Petitione...

Case Number: 3979

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-02-2013

Chandigarh

The Chandigarh Housing Board V/S The Sagrodha Cooperative House Bldg.

Housing Board  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 735 of 2011 1. The Sagrodha Cooperative House Bldg.(1st) Society Ltd. through its President House No. 1116 SEctor-8/C Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Chandigarh Housing BoardChadigarh thruogh its Chairman SE...

Case Number: 735

|

Date of Filing: 15-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

THE CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD V/S NAVJYOT KHANNA AND ANR.

Housing Board  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ SHARMA

Respondant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 277 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 30/03/2007 in Complaint No. 68/2006 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. NAVJYOT KHANNA AND ANR............Appellant(s)Versus1. THE CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD...........Responde...

Case Number: 277

|

Date of Filing: 10-05-2007

|

Date of Upload: 12-06-2013

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Housing Board in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Housing Board ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Housing Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.