Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate MS. VIKAS JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3052 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 03/04/2014 in Appeal No. 87/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDTHROUGH RESIDENT ENGINEER, RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD, BHILWARARAJASTHAN.....
Case Number: 3052
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. CHANDRA PRAKASH
Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK ARORA, MR. ANUJ R. YADAV & MR. JITENDER KUMAR KRANTI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 182 OF 2014 IN RP/1883/20131. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD...........Appellants(s)Versus1. AMIT ROY...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. VINAY KU...
Case Number: 182
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILIND KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2014 IN RP/3789/20111. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. RAMESH CHANDRA MANGAL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING ...
Case Number: 72
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. CHANDRA PRAKASH
Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK ARORA, MR. ANUJ R. YADAV & MR. JITENDER KUMAR KRANTI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1883 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 01/02/2013 in Appeal No. 383/2012 of the State Commission None)1. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARDTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN, SECTOR -9CHANDIGARH...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 1883
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2240 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 22/03/2012 in Appeal No. 2/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDDivision, through Resident Engineer Patel Cirelce UdaipurRajasthan.........
Case Number: 2240
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-11-2014
Case Number: 184
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2000
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. RACHANA JOSHI ISSAR
Respondant Advocate MR. VIKAS MAHAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2985 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 26/04/2011 in Appeal No. 84/2010 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARDSector- 9D, Through its SecretaryChandhigarhChandhigarh...........Pet...
Case Number: 2985
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L. JANJANI & PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1222 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 02/11/2011 in Appeal No. 896/2011 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & 2 ORS.through President,Housing Board, Office janpathJaipurRajastha...
Case Number: 1222
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. REKHA AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2132 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 12/02/2014 in Appeal No. 454/2012 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. CHATTISGARH HOUSING BOARDKABIR NAGAR, THROUGH ITS CHIEF ESTATE OFFICER, RAIPUR C.G-492001....
Case Number: 2132
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L.JANJANI & MR. PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1754 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 04/02/2014 in Appeal No. 9/2014 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. DEPUTY HOUSING COMMISSIONER & 2 ORS.RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD,CIRCLR OFFICE FIRST , SECTOR-5, KUD...
Case Number: 1817
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-11-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Housing Board in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Housing Board ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Housing Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.