Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIKAS MEHTA
Respondant Advocate Mr. M.A.Siddiqi
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. 466 OF 2002(Against the Order dated 16/09/2002 in Complaint No. 153/98 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. MANAGEMENT OF FATIMA HOSPITAL35 - C MAHANAGAR LUCKNOWU.P. ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MR. DHANWA...
Case Number: 466
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2002
|
Date of Upload: 25-02-2010
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate R.P.Rameshan
Respondant Advocate P.Mahamoodh
In The Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumKannurconsumer case(CC) No. OP/113/2000 A.C.Vijayavalli,W/O.Balakrishna Kuruppu ...........Appellant(s)Vs.DR.Venugopal.P.R,Josgiri Hospital ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. GOPALAN.K 2. JESSY.M.D 3. PREETHAKUMARI.K.P Complainant(s)/Ap...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2000
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.K.S.Brar.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Mohinder Pal Garg,O.P.s.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001 consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/54 Santosh RaniJawahar Lal,Pardeep Kumar, Sunny , ...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUNIL JHA
Respondant Advocate M/S. BHASIN & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIFIRST APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 29/09/2008 in Complaint No. 121/2000 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. SYED MONIS AHMAD, THROUGH ATTORNEY MRS. RAZIA AHMADM-27, Sector 25, NoidaDist. Gautam Budh Nagar Utta...
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2010
Court Name: Tumkur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, TUMAKURUOld D.C.Office Compound,Tumkur-572 101.Complaint Case No. CC/91/2009( Date of Filing : 22 Sep 2009 )1. SHAUKANTH ALI KHANTUMAKURU...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DR AKHILA SARAH ,SEVA HOSPITALTUMAKURU............Opp.Party(s) BE...
Case Number: 91
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2019
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATIONCONSUMER CASE NO. 05 of 09 1. GENERALSECRETARY,MARKAZ MMM HOSPITALPO.KUTTIPPURAM,MALAPPURAM-DT.PIN.679571,KERALA. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 27 Jan 2010 ORDER By Smt. C. S. Sule...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate D P Mahta
Respondant Advocate H C Sayani
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 22 Jul 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2667/2009(Against the Order dated 18/03/2009 in Appeal No. 103/2009 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. DARSHAN SIGHS/o. Sh .Hari Singh R/o. 7/11. East Patel Nagar New D...
Case Number: 2667
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV DUGGAL
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 23 Nov 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4337/2009(Against the Order dated 28/11/2008 in Appeal No. 437/2005 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. BALAJI HOSPITAL PVT. LTD.195, Deepali Opp. Rohini D.D.A. Office P...
Case Number: 4337
|
Date of Filing: 23-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2010
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SMT. I.MAAMU VANI
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/1686/07(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District East Godwari-II at Rajahmundry)1. B.KRISHANAMURTHYD.NO.4-7/1-79 B-BLOCK TUDA APTS I.S.MAHAL ROAD TIRUPATI-07Andhra Pradesh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MULTI SUPER SPECIALTY DENTAL HOSPITALDR.M.M...
Case Number: 1686
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Hospital in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Hospital ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Hospital under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.