Hospital
Latest Judgments
Total 10810 Consumer Court Cases Against Hospital.
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2017
KRUSHNA MAHADEO DABERAO V/S SHUKLA CHILDREN HOSPITAL DR. PARTHASARTHI MUKUND SHUKLA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A.S.CHANDURKAR
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001Revision Petition No. RP/11/14(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/01/2011 in Case No. cc/10/13 of District )1. SHUKLA CHILDREN HOSPITAL DR...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Amar Hospital V/S Amandeep Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate None for appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. R.K.Shukla, Adv. for OPs
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019APPEAL NO. 664 of 2008 1. Amandeep Singhminor son of Bhupinder Singh resident of H.No.35, Tobha Chet Singh near PSEB , Office Nabha , Gate Patiala...
Case Number: 664
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Mukat Hospital and Heart Institute V/S Surjit Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh.Chaman Lal, Adv. for appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh.Aftab Singh, Adv. for OP No. 1, Sh.Manvinder Singh, Adv. proxy for Sh. Amit Rawal, Adv. for OP No. 2
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019APPEAL NO. 1883 of 2008 1. Surjit SinghS/o Late Sh. Pal Singh , 2321 , Sector 71, Mohali ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Mukat Hospital and Heart Ins...
Case Number: 1883
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
IVY HOSPITAL & ANR. V/S SURJIT KAUR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMAN PRIYE JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI TRANSFER APPLICATION NO. 14 OF 20111. SURJIT KAURResident of House No. 3356, Bankers Enclave, Sector 50Chandigarh...........Appellants(s)Versus1. IVY HOSPITAL & ANR.Super Specialty Health Care, Sector 71, SAS NagarMohaliPun...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2011
Case Number: 189
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-01-2020
Sra Eye Hospital V/S Amarjit Singh
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh. Harinder Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sandeep Baghla,O.P.s No.1&2.Sh.M.R.Gupta,O.P.No.3.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/10/240 1. Amarjit SinghHead Constable, NO.536/MNS,aged about 43 years, son of Bakhtaur ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
A.M.E.s Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, Raichur V/S Sri.M.Srinivas S/o. M. Sangameshwara Rao, Bangalore
Court Name: Raichur
Appelant Advocate Sri. I.M. Patil
Respondant Advocate
Execution Application No. EA/11/31. Sri.M.Srinivas S/o. M. Sangameshwara Rao, BangaloreR/o. H.No. 1139, 15th Main, 8th Crss, 1st stage BTM, Layout, Bangalore-49BangaloreKarnataka...........Appellant(s)Versus1. A.M.E.s Dental College Hospital & Research Centre, RaichurDepartment o...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SANTOKABA DURLABH JI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & ORS. V/S IQBAL AHMED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JITENDRA MITRUCKA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1089 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 17/09/2009 in Appeal No. 996/2004 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. IQBAL AHMEDR/o. 1023-C, Chaar Darwaja, Gangapole Road, Near AAB SchoolJaipurRajasthan...........
Case Number: 1089
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2011
MANOHAR LAL V/S ST.STEPHENS HOSPITAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJEEV SHARMA
Respondant Advocate DR. K.E. MOSES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 836 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 01/09/2006 in Appeal No. 491/2000 of the State Commission Delhi)1. ST.STEPHENS HOSPITAL- - -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MANOHAR LAL- - -...........Respondent(s)...
Case Number: 836
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 15-06-2011
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Hospital in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Hospital ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Hospital under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.