Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVEEN R. NATH
Respondant Advocate M/S. LAWYERS & KNIT & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 15/08/2005 in Complaint No. 20/2000 of the State Commission Kerala)1. ABRAHAM KOOLA AND ANR.KOOLA HOUSE, KUNDANNUR POST THRISSUR KERALA STATE2. Master Sinto KoolaS/o :Abraham Ko...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2007
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KIRAN SURI
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2940 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 21/07/2006 in Appeal No. 723/2004 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. M/S NANJAPPA HOSPITAL AND ANR.KUCEMPU ROAD , SHIMOGA 577201 -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 2940
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2006
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2011
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adv. Nilesh Tombare/Adv. Vijay I. Shetty
Respondant Advocate .
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/855(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/05/2009 in Case No. 70/09 of District Satara)1. ARYA HOSPITAL & ORSMEDHA through Dr. Sunil Anandrao Dalavi, R/o. Medha. TAL JAOLISATARAMahara...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N D PHADKE
Respondant Advocate Mr. Pramod Kathane & Mr. Yogesh Sankpal
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/855(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/05/2009 in Case No. 70/09 of District Satara)1. ARYA HOSPITAL & ORSMEDHA through Dr. Sunil Anandrao Dalavi, R/o. Medha. TAL JAOLISATARAMahara...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Warangal
Appelant Advocate P.ARAVIND& K.RAJESHWAR
Respondant Advocate ALN Reddy
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2016
Court Name: Nashik
Appelant Advocate Y.H.Aaher
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/309/20101. shree vijay Dasharath NaiduFlat no.2 shital vihar Unmesh hall javal dr.bhabha nagar ,nasiknasikmaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Wokheart hospitalVadala nkya javal mumbai agra road,nashikmaharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'AB...
Case Number: 309
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate Mulani
Respondant Advocate Devadhar
1Behind District Treasury Office, Near Central Administrative, Building, Solapur.Complaint Case No. cc/09/676 1. Balasaheb Bhaskrrao PatiolAt post Nannaj Tal North Solapur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. 1)Smt Mallvaabai Vallyal Charitable Dental Hospital 2)Nagesh Vallyal 3)Sand...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.K.S.Bhullar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.S.M.Goyal,O.P.No.2.Sh.Narinder Singla,O.P.No.3.Sh.Sunder Gupta,O.P.No.4.Sh.Rajiv Gupta,O.P.No.1.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/10/338 1. Rajvir SinghS/o Sh. Harpal Singh, aged about 49 years, R/o VPO Kattianwali, T...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate N.Babu Rajan
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. 722/2002(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District ) 1. N.ThankappanEast Kundara,Koolam PRESENT : ORDER KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONVAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO.722/2002ORDER DATED: 9.6.2010Appeal filed against the...
Case Number: 722
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2002
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate N. S. Ramesh and Vivek
Respondant Advocate N. K. Unnikrishnan
Complaint Case No. op/03/9841. N. K. DayanandanNedungattil (H), Chevoor. P. O...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Elite Mission HospitalRep by Mg Partner, K. K. Mohandas2. Dr. P. K. Gopinatha MenonConsultant UrologistTrissurKerala3. Oriental Insurance Co Rep by Br. Manager, TSRTriss...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Hospital in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Hospital ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Hospital under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.