Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit-1, Kolkata8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site : confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/12/4991. Dr. Kabita Bhaumik1A, D.P.P. Road, Naktala, Kolkata-700047.KolkataWB...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Hewlett Packard Co...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate LD.ADVOCATE
Respondant Advocate Ld. Advocate
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.CC NO. 103 Of 2014 1. PUJA INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION34, NETAJI SUBHASH ROAD, GROUND FLOOR, KOLKATA-700001. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA SALES PVT. LTD. & OTHERS.24, SALARPURIA ARENA, ADUGODI, HOSUR...
Case Number: 103
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.V. DINESH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1858 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 26/02/2014 in Appeal No. 20/2014 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA SALES PRIVATE LIMITEDTHROUGH AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, TOWER D-6 6TH FLO...
Case Number: 1858
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2014
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 503
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2016
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate KMC Legal Venture
Respondant Advocate Vinod Jawale
Complaint Case No. CC/08/1591. Mr.Lee Bragaza10./A.A. Kolovery Kalina Santacuz(E) Mumbai-98Maharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Hewlett Packard India Pvt.Ltd.Solution 365,396/410.Sumeeta Terrace opp.Imp-crial Cinema Laminton Mumbai-04Maharastra............Opp.Party(s) BEFO...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.V. DINESH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 713 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 27/09/2012 in Appeal No. 110/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra) WITH IA/1294/2013,IA/1295/20131. GENERAL MANAGER, M/S. HEWLETT PACKARD INDIAENTERPRISE CENTRE ...
Case Number: 713
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2809 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/04/2012 in Appeal No. 285/2012 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. ALOK KUMAR ROYBldg No-A/2 Flat No-06 (Ist Floor) Opp Raolicamp Gurdwara, MA Road Sion Koliwa...
Case Number: 2809
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2013 IN RP/2809/20121. ALOK KUMAR ROY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HEAD OF THE SALES & SERVICE (LAP TOP COMPUTER) HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA SALES PVT. LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s) ...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-02-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R RAVIDRAN
Respondant Advocate .
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/858(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/07/2010 in Case No. 33/2008 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA SALES P LTDUNIT NO 1 & 2 GROUND FLOOR ENTERPRISES CENTER C ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Darbhanga
Appelant Advocate ADV. PREM PRAKASH
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/60/08( Date of Filing : 23 Dec 2008 )1. AJAY KUMARRESIDENT OF MOHALLA- KABIRCHAK (GANJ CHOWK) PS- SADAR DIST- DARBHANGA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA SALU PVT. LTD.PATNA............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUST...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Hewlett Packard in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Hewlett Packard ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Hewlett Packard under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.