Court Name: Farrukhabad
Appelant Advocate Rajesh kumar agnihotri
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Appellant in person
Respondant Advocate Ms. Anju Rathore, Adv. proxy for Ms. Promila Nain, Adv. for the respondents
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 169 of 2011 1. Sh. Mukesh JalwalSon of Sh. Bharat Singh resident of Flat #12, Second Floor, Penta VIP Towers, VIP Road Zirakpur P...
Case Number: 169
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ashwani Sharma, Adv. for the applicant/appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sandeep Suri, Adv. for the respondent
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 75 of 2011 1. Rajbir Kaurw/o Jagdip Singh R/o # 1261, Sector 18C, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Branch Man...
Case Number: 75
|
Date of Filing: 17-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate Anita Kulkarni
Respondant Advocate Anita Marathe,J.M.Baphana,Ashutosh Marathe
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT3RD FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BLDG., NR. CHETANA COLLEGE, BANDRA(E), MUMBAI-51.Complaint Case No. CC/09/7721. Mr. Deepak Dheeraj DaveC-804, , Shri Krishna Heights CHS Ltd., Upper Given Nagar, Malad-East, Mumbai-97............C...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Arvind Godbole
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/10/7171. Nafis Khan Sadik KhanQtr.No. 10/4, WCL, Khaparkheda, Tah.Saoner, Dist. NagpurNagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PUNIT K. BHALLA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1152 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 21/12/2010 in Appeal No. 43/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. HDFC BANK LTD.Having its Office at: SCO Sector 8-cChandigarh...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S...
Case Number: 1152
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-11-2011
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. R.S. Dhole
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/10/2441. Rajendra Sheshrao DholeNagpur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HDFC Bank Nagpur2. H.D.F.C. BankThroughIts Manager, Credit ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate RAKESH GUPTA ADV
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2016
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh.Balbir Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh.Vinod Garg,O.P.No.2.Sh.Varun Gupta,O.P.No.1.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001.Complaint Case No. CC/11/196 1. Smt. Jatinder Kaurw/o s.Nirmal preet singh r/o #a-3, Housefed complex, oppois...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Hdfc Hdfc Life Insurance Life Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SAJI ISSAC
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/11/469(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/02/2011 in Case No. CC/10/342 of District Alappuzha)1. HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE CO LTDKAYAMKULAM BRANCH,KMC32420.A,NH-47,NEAR CITY HOSPITAL...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Hdfc in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Hdfc ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Hdfc under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.