Hdfc
Latest Judgments
Total 15187 Consumer Court Cases Against Hdfc.
The Manager HDFC Bank Limited V/S Sri. K.S. Srinivas
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri. G.C. Pradeep
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/11/12151. Sri. K.S. SrinivasNo.162, Kattanur Village, NR Katramados Temple, Bangalore-560062.BangaloreKarnataka....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
HDFC Bank Ltd. V/S Ajay Udaychandra Jain
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv.
Respondant Advocate Adv.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/11/1651. Ajay Udaychandra JainOpp. Jain Mandir, ParwarpuraNagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HDFC Bank Ltd.Retail A...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2015
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2015
HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD. V/S YAGNESHBHAI MANUBHAI KOSHIA
Hdfc Life Insurance Life Insurance
Court Name: Navsari
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 14-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2019
HDFC BANK LTD,REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER V/S M/S.SREEKARA TEXTILES PVT.LTD.,REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR,MR.A.PRASHANTH,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S.V.SRIHARI
Respondant Advocate M/S V.S.RAJU
First Appeal No. FA/337/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/12/2009 in Case No. CC/659/2007 of District Hyderabad-II)1. M/S.SREEKARA TEXTILES PVT.LTD.,REP.BY ITS DIRECTOR,MR.A.PRASHANTH,D.NO.21-1-821/UGF,24 & 25 GROUND FLOOR,R.J.MARKET,HYD-02...........Appellant(s)Versus1. HDFC BAN...
Case Number: 337
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
HDFC BANK LTD V/S M/S PNJ POLYKNITS LTD
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. 475/20061. M/S PNJ POLYKNITS LTD74, CHAMPAGALLI 1ST FLOOR M.J.MARKET MUMBAI-400 002...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HDFC BANK LTDCRAWFORD MARKET, LOKMANYA TILAK RD, MUMBAI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT Shri S.S. Patil , H...
Case Number: 475
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Branch Manager, HDFC Bank, V/S Ram Prakash Bedi
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rakesh K. Sharma,
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 211 of 2010 1. Ram Prakash BediR/o 127, Sector 35/A, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Branch Manager, HDFC Bank,Sector 35/B, Chandigarh. .....
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
mANAGER, HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE V/S SATHEESH LAL
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/09/1171. SATHEESH LALNANDANAM , pUNNAMOODU, VARKALA, Presently residing at PVP sadanam, Punnamoodu, Varkala,ThiruvananthapuramKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. mANAGER, ...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
HDFC V/S Yash Paul Singla
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhMISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 48 of 2012 1. Yash Paul SinglaChd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 15 Mar 2012 ORDER BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH Misc. ...
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Hdfc in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Hdfc ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Hdfc under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.