Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2959 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank V/S Ram Chander
Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank Haryana
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Ramesh Singh Dhull
Respondant Advocate Sh.R.K Nagpal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KAITHAL. Complaint Case No.129 of 2020. Date of institution: 19.03.2020. Date of decision:23.11.2022.Ram Chander S/o Sh. Mewa age 50 years, resident of Village Harsola, Tehsil & Distt. Kaithal. …Complainant...
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2020
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2022
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Des Raj Sachdeva
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Amit Sachdeva
Respondant Advocate Bhanu Partap Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 488 of 2020 Date of instt.05.11.2020 Date of Decision 23.11.2022Des Raj Sachdeva son of late Shri Thakur Dass, resident of house no.20 Bank Colony Karnal age 71 years. Mobile no.9254122907. ...
Case Number: 488
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2020
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2022
Estate Manager, Housing Board Haryana V/S Sarita Devi
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. Yudhbir Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh. Randhir Singh Yadav
Case Number: 262
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2020
|
Date of Upload: 24-11-2022
Estate Officer Haryana Sahri Vikas Pradhikaran & Others V/S Ashok Kumar Jindal S/o Chote Lal Jindal
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar
Respondant Advocate
Distic forum Faridabad, hariyanafaridabadfinal orderComplaint Case No. CC/631/2021( Date of Filing : 07 Dec 2021 )1. Ashok Kumar Jindal S/o Chote Lal JindalH. No. 1848...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Estate Officer Haryana Sahri Vikas Pradhikaran & OthersFaridabad............Opp...
Case Number: 631
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2022
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam V/S Shamsher Singh
Court Name: Kaithal
Appelant Advocate Sh.Umesh Malik
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Battan
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KAITHAL. Complaint Case No.166 of 2022. Date of institution: 05.07.2022. Date of decision:21.11.2022.Shamsher Singh, age 60 years, son of Sh. Chandagi Ram, resident of Village Fariabad, Tehsil Rajound, District Kaitha...
Case Number: 166
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2022
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2022
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Versa
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Jitender Veer Singh
Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL. Complaint No. 539 of 2019 Date of instt.21.08.2019 Date of Decision:16.11.20221. Versa wife of Shri Sandeep, resident of Gali no.7, Vikas Nagar, Phoosgarh road, Karnal.2. Sanjay Kumar son of Shri Arjan Singh, re...
Case Number: 539
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2019
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2022
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd., V/S Randhir Singh
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vivek Kumar
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/21/306( Date of Filing : 20 Apr 2021 )1. Randhir SinghS/o Late Sh. Rattan Singh, age 79 years, r/o H.no. 170/27, Kamal Colony, Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 20-04-2021
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2022
M/S IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, GURGAON, HARYANA V/S SAVARA NARASAMMA
Court Name: Visakhapatnam
Appelant Advocate V.HEMANTH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MANTRI SRI NAGESH
Case Number: 165
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2023
M/S IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, GURGAON, HARYANA V/S VEDWATI SINGH
Court Name: Visakhapatnam
Appelant Advocate V.HEMANTH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MANTRI SRI NAGESH
Case Number: 167
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2023
M/S IFFCO-TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, GURGAON, HARYANA V/S JYOTHI DHABARE
Court Name: Visakhapatnam
Appelant Advocate V.HEMANTH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MANTRI SRI NAGESH
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2023
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.