Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. O.P.KHADARIA
Respondant Advocate MR. SURYANARAYANA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2933 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 30/08/2006 in Appeal No. 1876/2000 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DEEPAK KUMAR GOSWAMISOLAR PAINTS E-174, GREATER KAILASH -I, NEW DELHI - ...........Petition...
Case Number: 2933
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2006
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2010
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Railway Haryana Indian Railway
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate A.K.TEWARI
Respondant Advocate NA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 79 OF 20041. INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANISATION...........Complainant(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Fo...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2004
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VISHAL GUPTA
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 937 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 01/04/2006 in Appeal No. 508/2003 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORP.3-6 SECTOR 2 PANCHKULA PANCHKULA ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 937
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2006
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNABH CHOWDHURY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1081 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/10/2009 in Appeal No. 2800/2002 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS.Through its Assistant Executive Engineer, Sub...
Case Number: 1081
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 20-10-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIPUL RAHEJA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1112 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 07/01/2009 in Appeal No. 1539/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. AMIR SINGHS/o.Sh. Asha Singh R/o. Village. Paharipur . Tehsil Jagadhri. Yamuna Nagar Haryana ....
Case Number: 1112
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAM NARESH YADAV
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1766 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 15/10/2009 in Appeal No. 2173/2003 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. BHATERIResident of Village Dabina, Tehsil and District RewariRewariHaryana ...........Petition...
Case Number: 1766
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURAT SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1227 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 30/12/2009 in Appeal No. 1847/2009 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. DEV RAJR/o. Hanuman Gate, Teh. And District- BhiwaniBhiwaniHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)Ver...
Case Number: 1227
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2010
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. No. RBT/FA/45/2010FIRST APPEAL NO. FA of 2010InO.A. NO.FA/442/2002 1. Dakshin Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd.through its Sub D...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. RAMESH KUMAR HARITASH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2711 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 21/04/2010 in Appeal No. 381/2010 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. SURESH KUMAR GUPTAResident of 254, Sector-23FaridabadHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. D...
Case Number: 2711
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-08-2010
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. J.B. MUDGIL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1960 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 08/06/2009 in Appeal No. 707/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. ASHOK KUMAR SHARMAR/o. House No. 768, Housing Board Colony, Sector-7Ambala CityHaryana ...........
Case Number: 1960
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2010
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.