Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PARDEEP SOLATH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1865 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 30/01/2009 in Appeal No. 2254/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION LTD.Throgh its. Manager, Bays. No.49-52, Sector....
Case Number: 1871
|
Date of Filing: 25-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1075 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 21/01/2011 in Appeal No. 393/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAM CHANDER GAURR?o. Narheri, Tehril NarnaulMahendragarhHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 1075
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. MEGHNA SANKHLA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3339 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 01/06/2011 in Appeal No. 674/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. P.C. SHARMAR/o House no-1/98, Ground Floor,Vikas PuriNew Delhi - 110018Delhi...........Petition...
Case Number: 3339
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NARENDER VASHISHTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3191 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 20/12/2010 in Appeal No. 387/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. DELITE THEATRER/o Chautala Road,Mandi DabwaliSirsaHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 3191
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3550 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 05/01/2007 in Appeal No. 666/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORSSUB DIVISION OFFICER (CITY)O.P SUB DIVISION FATEHA...
Case Number: 3550
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2007
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3262 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 05/07/2011 in Appeal No. 176/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through its S.D.O, 'O.P' Sub Division CitySirsaHaryana.....
Case Number: 3262
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SHAHID ALI & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 364 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 09/05/2011 in Complaint No. 3204/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. RAJ SAW MILLSThrough its Partner Sh. Satish Kumar Arora, Barahi- Talab Road, Old Faridabad-1...
Case Number: 364
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2485 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 03/01/2011 in Appeal No. 356/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NAND LALS/o Madan Lal, C/o Super Bakery, Oil Railway Road,GurgoanHaryana...........Petitioner(s...
Case Number: 2485
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3100 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 06/01/2007 in Appeal No. 320/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ANR.OP SUB DIVISION. JAKHAL, DISTRICT FATEHABAD, H...
Case Number: 3100
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2007
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3099 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 06/01/2007 in Appeal No. 1906/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED & ANR . THROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SUB DIV...
Case Number: 3099
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2007
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.