Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R. S. BADHRAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1072 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 24/10/2011 in Appeal No. 536/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTRHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, Sector-6PanchkulkaHa...
Case Number: 1072
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2012
Development Authority Hotel Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh.Neeraj Pal Sharma, Adv. for the complainant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sikander Bakshi, Adv. for the OPs
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019CONSUMER CASE NO. 54 of 2006 1. M/s Daulat Ram Hotel (P) Ltd.1644, Urban Estate-II, Hisar through its Managing Director Sh. Ashwani Kumar ...........
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 722 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/09/2009 in Appeal No. 671/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAYAWANTIW/o Sri Sat pal House no-340, Sector-12-APanchkulaHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus...
Case Number: 722
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. B.S. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3755 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 22/07/2011 in Appeal No. 499/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARBANS SINGHS/o Sh Jodh Singh, R/o Rajinder Colony, Patiala Chowk, Jind, TehsilJindHaryana.......
Case Number: 3755
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. INDUS LAW FIRM
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1405 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/02/2011 in Appeal No. 1623/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAGHBIR CHANDWard No. 3, IndriKarnalHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJL...
Case Number: 1405
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JASBIR SINGH MALIK
Respondant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2349 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 31/03/2010 in Appeal No. 718/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KRISHAN KUMARR/o. House No. 1, Near Jalan Eye HospitalBhiwaniHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Ver...
Case Number: 2349
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. BSK LEGAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3250 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 19/05/2011 in Appeal No. 3277/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RANGU RAMS/o Sh Ram Chand, R/o Village Kuttabadh, tehsil,EllenabadSirsaHaryana...........Petit...
Case Number: 3250
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 61 OF 2012 IN RP/3486/20111. GULSHAN JAIN...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE ...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. RAJEEV KAPOOR & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 294 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/10/2011 in Appeal No. 2549/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUBODH MEHRAS/o Shri KJ Mehra, R/o I-750 Palam ViharGurgaonharyana...........Petitioner(s)Versu...
Case Number: 294
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2012
Court Name: Kollam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Civil Station,KollamKeralaCC NO. 62 Of 20121. raginth rajan santha ;udayagiri;115 vikas nagar ;pattathanam kollam...........Complainant(s)Versus1. nokia india pvt ltd;sp infocity industrial plot 243;udyog vihar ;phase 1 dundhahera ;gurgon haryana...
Case Number: 62
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.