Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2956 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Ravi Khokar V/S Secretary, State Transport Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate None for the appellants
Respondant Advocate Ms. Tajinder Kaur, Adv. for the respondents
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 145 of 2012 1. Secretary, State Transport Haryana ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Ravi Khokar ...........Respondent(s) For the Ap...
Case Number: 145
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S DEPUTY LAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1444 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 20/12/2011 in Appeal No. 435/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DEPUTY LALS/o Sh Deewan Chand R/o No-40/627 Baldev NagarAmbalaHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Ve...
Case Number: 1444
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2012
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S JASPAL SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NARENDER SINGH YADAV
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2115 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 16/06/2011 in Appeal No. 1534/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. JASPAL SINGHS/o Shri Maghar Singh R/o Village Sant Nagar Tehsil Rania SirsaHaryana...........P...
Case Number: 2115
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2012
Mohanlal Dhar V/S M/s Vision Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 07-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2016
HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. V/S KUMARI NANCY SHARMA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHISH PAL LALER
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 437 OF 2012 IN RP/1835/20121. KUMARI NANCY SHARMA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. J...
Case Number: 437
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-08-2012
Haryana Travels V/S Ram Chander
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Ashish Kumar Gupta
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 384 of 2011 1. Ram ChanderS/o Late Sh.Umrao Singh R/o H.No.2040, Sector 70, Mohali.2. Preeti BalaD/o Sh.Ram Chander R/o H.No.2040, Sector 70, Mohal...
Case Number: 384
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
THE HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S BOUTIQUE INTERNATIONAL
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIJAY MANGLA & N.P. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 331 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 11/07/2011 in Complaint No. 36/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BOUTIQUE INTERNATIONALPlot No. 553, Sector-37, Pace city-II,having Registered office at 202, Padma ...
Case Number: 331
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2012
BHAWNESH KUMAR TANEJA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JURIS PRERITUS
Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL PRUTHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 309 OF 2012 IN RP/1036/20071. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BHAWNESH KUMAR TANEJA ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PR...
Case Number: 309
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2012
M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 451 OF 2012 IN FA/35/19991. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAI...
Case Number: 451
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2012
M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR RAVINDRA BANA
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 452 OF 2012 IN FA/35/19991. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. M/S. STANLAY ENGG. PVT. LTD. ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAI...
Case Number: 452
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.