Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAVI PANWAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3585 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/02/2012 in Appeal No. 1462/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. VIJAY PAL SINGHR/o H.No-14,Sector-14SonepatHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. UTTARI HARY...
Case Number: 3585
|
Date of Filing: 19-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2012
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHAL MAHAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/07/2011 in Appeal No. 465/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERSS/o Shri Darshan Kumar, House no-114,Sector-13,Ext,, KarnalH...
Case Number: 3764
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2012
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHAL MAHAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/07/2011 in Appeal No. 465/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERSS/o Shri Darshan Kumar, House no-114,Sector-13,Ext,, KarnalH...
Case Number: 3765
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2012
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
Respondant Advocate MR. VISHAL MAHAJAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3764 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/07/2011 in Appeal No. 465/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERSS/o Shri Darshan Kumar, House no-114,Sector-13,Ext,, KarnalH...
Case Number: 3766
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2012
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 304 of 2012 1. Surinder Kumar MittalR/o # 306, Sector 12, Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. State Government of HaryanaThe Chief Secretary to the Government of Haryana, Civil Secretariat Chandigarh2. The Director o...
Case Number: 304
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV BAHL
Respondant Advocate MS. KITTU BAJAJ
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 392 OF 2012 IN FA/229/20071. M/S. HARYANA PACKAIDS PVT. LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PR...
Case Number: 392
|
Date of Filing: 11-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-10-2012
Haryana Cooperative Cooperative
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 49 of 2012 1. The Haryana State Cooperative Supplyand Marketing Federation Ltd. Corporate Office Sector-5 Panchkula through its General manager (F& A) ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Bharti AXA General Insuance Co.Ltd.SCO ...
Case Number: 49
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJESH KUMAR SINGLA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 624 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/09/2011 in Appeal No. 1692/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SHIV KUMARS/o Sh Jagdish Raj, C/o Shakti Ice Factory RoadYamuna NagarHaryana...........Petition...
Case Number: 624
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-09-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NARENDER SINGH YADAV
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 625 OF 2012 IN RP/2115/20121. JASPAL SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI...
Case Number: 625
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-09-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SATINDER S. GULATI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1615 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 04/05/2011 in Appeal No. 12/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA AGRO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.Through its Managing Director, SCO No-825-826,Sec...
Case Number: 1615
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-09-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.