company-name-logo

Haryana

Latest Judgments

Total 2956 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.

NCDRC

HOUSING BOARD HARYANA V/S ASHOK GUPTA

Housing Board   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DAVINDER KUMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 606 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 20/12/2010 in Appeal No. 1700/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. ASHOK GUPTAR/o. Jalberia Niwas, Rewari Road, Narnaul, Tehsil NarnaulMahendargarhHaryana...........

Case Number: 606

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2011

|

Date of Upload: 11-01-2013

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER V/S SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERS

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 786 OF 2012 IN RP/3764/20111. SH. DEVENDER KUMAR ANAND AND OTHERS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER...........Res...

Case Number: 786

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER V/S SMT. SUDESH KUMARI AND OTHERS

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL

Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 787 OF 2012 IN RP/3765/20111. SMT. SUDESH KUMARI AND OTHERS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH IT'S CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AND ANOTHER...........Responden...

Case Number: 787

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 27-11-2012

NCDRC

UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. V/S RAM DAYAL

Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV NIRWANI

Respondant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 651 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 04/06/2010 in Appeal No. 1334/2002 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAM DAYALR/o. Vill. Garhi Gosain, P.O. Mustafabad, Tehsil JagadhariYamuna NagarHaryana............

Case Number: 651

|

Date of Filing: 23-02-2011

|

Date of Upload: 21-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. V/S P.D. GUPTA

Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. P.D.GUPTA

Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA RANA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 242 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 24/12/2010 in Complaint No. 7/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. P.D. GUPTAS/O LATE SHRI A.S. AGGARWAL, R/O-27/1, 2ND FLOOR, NANGIA PARK, SHAKTI NAGAR,NEW DELHI-110007...

Case Number: 242

|

Date of Filing: 10-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 21-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RANI DEVI

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. G. I . SHARMA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2942 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/06/2012 in Appeal No. 2242/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RANI DEVIW/o Shri Laxmi Chand Gupta, R/o House No. 884, Sector 7, Ambala CityHaryana.............

Case Number: 2942

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 05-11-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUKHBIR SINGH

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MANOJ KUMAR SOOD

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2920 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 05/04/2011 in Appeal No. 1075/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUKHBIR SINGHS/o Shri Ami Chand, R/o of House no- 1922, Sector- 8FaridabadHaryana...........Pe...

Case Number: 2920

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 02-11-2012

NCDRC

ESTATE MANAGER, HOUSING BOARD, HARYANA V/S P.D. SHARMA

Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. DEEPAK BHANWALA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 76 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 26/08/2011 in Appeal No. 694/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. P.D. SHARMAS/o Sh Shanti Sarup, R/o House No-1713, MIG/GF, Sector-6 KarnalHaryana...........Petit...

Case Number: 76

|

Date of Filing: 09-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-10-2012

NCDRC

S.D.O., DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S MANAK RAM & 4 ORS.

Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate DR. SUSHIL BALWADA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3187 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 21/07/2011 in Appeal No. 967/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MANAK RAM & 4 ORS.S/o Sh Bhola Ram R/o Village Patwan, Tehsil Loharu BhiwaniHaryana2. Jai Bhagw...

Case Number: 3187

|

Date of Filing: 28-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-10-2012

NCDRC

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SANJAY KUMAR JANGRA

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2815 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 01/03/2012 in Appeal No. 203/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SANJAY KUMAR JANGRAS/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Jangra R/o Village Dhana LadanpurBhiwaniHaryana........

Case Number: 2815

|

Date of Filing: 31-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 18-10-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.