Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2956 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
SURAT SINGH & ANR. V/S HARYANA BEEJ COMPANY & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.K. SHARMA & MR. MOHAN SHYAM ARYA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 41 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 26/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1388/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA BEEJ COMPANY & ANR.THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, PRAVEEN KUMAR HARYANA BEEJ COMPANY, SHOP REWA...
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2013
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S NANBAI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GOVIND NARAYAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4819 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/10/2011 in Appeal No. 2064/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NANBAIW/o Late Shri Bajrang Lal, R/o Near Railway Bridge Circular RoadBHIWANIHARYANA.............
Case Number: 4819
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 22-01-2013
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S AMIT MARWAH
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. MEENAKSHI ARORA
Respondant Advocate MS. CHARU SANGWAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3126 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/10/2008 in Appeal No. 803/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. AMIT MARWAHS/o Parmanand, R/o 1189,NHBCPanipatHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HARYANA U...
Case Number: 3126
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2013
S.D.O., DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S SANJEEV KUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. BSK LEGAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4124 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 05/10/2011 in Appeal No. 1000/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SANJEEV KUMARS/o Shri Prakash Chand, R/o Bhim, Colony, SirsaDISTRICT - SIRSAHARYANA..............
Case Number: 4124
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 18-01-2013
State Govt. of Haryana V/S Surinder Kumar Mittal
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 05 of 2013 1. Surinder Kumar Mittal ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 17 Jan 2013 ORDER BEFOR...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. V/S M/S. PHOOL CHAND VED PRAKASH,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3989 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 08/11/2011 in Appeal No. 920/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. PHOOL CHAND VED PRAKASH,Through its Karta V.K Gupta, Maharauli Rooad, 842/18,Naharpur Road...
Case Number: 3989
|
Date of Filing: 18-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2013
THE NEW HARYANA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING LTD. V/S V. K. SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANOOP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Respondant Advocate MR. DEEPAK JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1180 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/10/2011 in Appeal No. 83/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. V. K. SINGHS/o Sh Karan Pal Singh, R/o House No-357-B,Sector-39B Housing Board ColonyGurgaonHary...
Case Number: 1180
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-01-2013
THE STATE OF HARYANA & 3 ORS. V/S JETHA NAND & 3 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADARSH GANESH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4152 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 02/07/2012 in Appeal No. 81/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. JETHA NAND & 3 ORS.S/o Shri Sanu Ram Sapra, House No-404, Rampura ColonyDISTRICT - YAMUNA NAGARH...
Case Number: 4152
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2013
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. V/S HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATION LTD.
Iffco Tokio General Insurance General Insurance Haryana Insurance
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. YASHPAL RANGI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4713 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/09/2012 in Appeal No. 703/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATION LTD.(Hafed) Through District Manager,J...
Case Number: 4713
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2013
VIBHA SHARMA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR BISLA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2334 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1831/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator,Sector-6PanchkulaHary...
Case Number: 2334
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-12-2012
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.