Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. UPADHYAY & UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 282 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 18/09/2012 in Appeal No. 491/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. THE HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BAY NO-49-52...
Case Number: 282
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. UPADHYAY & UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 283 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 08/11/2012 in Appeal No. 1642/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. THE HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION LTDTHROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BAY NO-49-52...
Case Number: 283
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2013
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHRENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 194 OF 2013 IN RP/1644/20121. HAR KISHAN TANWAR & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. C...
Case Number: 194
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2013
Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural
Appelant Advocate V M PANCHOLI
Respondant Advocate -
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2021
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhMISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 21 of 2013 1. Lakhbir SinghS/o Sh. Jabit S Chaudhary, R/o # 1528, Village Kansal, Distt. Mohali, Punjab ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 08 Apr 2013 ORDER DISTRICT C...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 27-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Iffco Tokio General Insurance General Insurance Haryana Insurance
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. YASHPAL RANGI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4713 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/09/2012 in Appeal No. 703/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATION LTD.(Hafed) Through District Manager,J...
Case Number: 4713
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. DHARAM RAJ OHLAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 58 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 18/12/2007 in Complaint No. 38/2003 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD & ANR...........Appellant(s)Versus1. PARMILA DEVI & ORS. ........
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 02-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAJIV BAHL
Respondant Advocate MS. KITTU BAJAJ
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 229 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 05/03/2007 in Complaint No. 50/1998 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. HARYANA PACKAIDS PVT. LTD.MR. V S MANN 9, ASHOKA PARK EXTENSION DELHI -...........Appellant(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 229
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. V.K. SHARMA & MR. S.H. PARASHAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4817 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 26/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1003/2009 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1958/20131. CHANDER DUTTS/o Sh. Giljari Lal, R/o H.No-109, Near Kaushik, Nursary Bandep...
Case Number: 4817
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2013
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Surinder Kumar Mittal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 343 of 2012 1. Surinder Kumar MittalH.No. 306, Sector 12, Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. State Government of Haryana through 1. The Chief S...
Case Number: 343
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.