Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JURISPERITUS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1502 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/11/2011 in Appeal No. 2906/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.Through its Senior manag...
Case Number: 1503
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SALIL PAUL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 572 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 08/10/2012 in Appeal No. 3124/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1014/20131. HOUSING BOARD HARYANATHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, SECTOR-6, PANCHKULAHARYANA.........
Case Number: 572
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2398 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 13/02/2008 in Appeal No. 3405/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Sub Divisional Officer O.P. Sub DIvision Kirmach, Tehsil ...
Case Number: 2398
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 17-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.K. DIXIT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 334 OF 2013 IN RP/2425/20111. M/S. DHIMAN STEEL INDUSTRIES...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'...
Case Number: 334
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANCHAR ANAND
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1780 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 26/09/2011 in Appeal No. 2852/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DR. S.K. GULATIVijaya Nagar,Hisar,TehsilHisarHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN H...
Case Number: 1780
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2563 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 08/04/2008 in Appeal No. 130/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICE UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.NewalKarnalHaryana...........Petiti...
Case Number: 2563
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2013
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VENKAT SUBRAMONIAM T.R.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1506 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/01/2012 in Appeal No. 879/20006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. INDU BALA SATIJAW/o Sri Dharmvir Satija R/o 443 Dr Mukherji Nagar Near M.C,Primary SchoolDelhi...
Case Number: 1506
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2545 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 26/03/2008 in Appeal No. 2456/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Sub Divisional Officer O.P. Sub Division Sadhaura Tehsil ...
Case Number: 2545
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 09-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANIL MITTAL
Respondant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 89 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 10/11/2010 in Appeal No. 2793/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DEEPAK SHARMA & ANR.Resident of 97, Industrial Area Phase-IPanchkulaHaryana2. SURINDER SHARMA, S...
Case Number: 89
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LEGAL AXIS
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2385 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/06/2013 in Appeal No. 537/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/3973/20131. M/S. HARYANA CITY GAS DISTRIBUTION LTD.SH. SATISH CHOPRA (MANAGING DIRECTOR) S...
Case Number: 2385
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-06-2013
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.