Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2956 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
STATE OF HARYANA V/S GULSHAN JAIN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4832 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 14/08/2012 in Appeal No. 166/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GULSHAN JAINS/o Shri Tara Chand Jain, R/o 531-531,Street No-8, Madan Puri GURGAON - 122001........
Case Number: 4832
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2013
RANBIR V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2509 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 16/04/2008 in Appeal No. 745/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Sub Divisional Officer, Operation Sub Division Bhattu Ka...
Case Number: 2509
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2013
SITA RAM V/S UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 466 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 08/05/2012 in Appeal No. 1695/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.-KAITHALHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. SITA RAMS/...
Case Number: 466
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-08-2013
SUNIL BHARGAV V/S HOUSING BOARD HARYANA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SALIL PAUL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 399 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/10/2012 in Appeal No. 683/2011 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/705/20131. HOUSING BOARD HARYANATHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, SECTOR-6PANCHKULAHARYANA.............
Case Number: 399
|
Date of Filing: 01-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2013
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S AJIT SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate SHRI RAM MALHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4335 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/07/2012 in Appeal No. 138/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. AJIT SINGHS/o Sulkhan Singh, R/o Village Bartoli , Tehsil, ThanesarKURUSHETRAHARYANA..............
Case Number: 4335
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2013
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VIDYUT NIGAM LTD. V/S SHRI CHAND (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS S/O. SAT NARAYAN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. ALOK SANGWAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1250 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 23/12/2010 in Appeal No. 166/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SHRI CHAND (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS S/O. SAT NARAYANS/O SUMAN LAL, R/O DN COLLEGE ROAD HISS...
Case Number: 1250
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2013
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S JAIWANTRI SHARMA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1882 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 02/01/2012 in Appeal No. 477/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. JAIWANTRI SHARMAW/o Sh Ram Diya, R/o Village Jalouli, Tehsil PanchkulaHaryana...........Petitio...
Case Number: 1882
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-08-2013
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S RAJINDER KUMAR
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. SUSHILA THAKRAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4012 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 03/07/2012 in Appeal No. 367/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAJINDER KUMARSH. KRISHAN CHAND, R/O HOUSE NO.462, SECTOR 13, HUDA,KARNAL HARYANA...........Pet...
Case Number: 4012
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-08-2013
MOHAN LAL V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1657 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/05/2007 in Appeal No. 455/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER O. P. SUB DIVISION...
Case Number: 1657
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 07-08-2013
VINOD KUMAR V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNABH CHOWDHURY & MR. GAINILUNG PANMEI
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1881 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 19/12/2007 in Appeal No. 353/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.THROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (OP) CITY S/DIVISION,...
Case Number: 1881
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.