Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2956 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
BALJIT SINGH NAIN V/S NEW HARYANA OFFICERS COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSHU GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3087 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 26/07/2013 in Appeal No. 120/2013 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/5384/20131. NEW HARYANA OFFICERS COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.PANCHKULA ,THROUG...
Case Number: 3087
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-09-2013
PAWAN KUMAR V/S UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNABH CHOWDHURY
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1632 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/11/2007 in Appeal No. 2803/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.THROUGH ITS SUB - DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OPERATION CITY SUB ...
Case Number: 1632
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 24-09-2013
GAJE SINGH V/S UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1953 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 01/01/2008 in Appeal No. 2743/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER O. P. SUB DIVISION,...
Case Number: 1953
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2013
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S LAXMI NARAIN
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RITESH KHARE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2013 IN RP/3971/20121. LAXMI NARAIN...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. CHAUDHARI, PR...
Case Number: 360
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2013
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR. V/S DR. S.K. GULATI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANCHAR ANAND
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 465 OF 2013 IN RP/1780/20121. DR. S.K. GULATI...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK,...
Case Number: 465
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2013
STATE OF HARYANA & ANR. V/S MRS. RANJIT NARULA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. GARGI KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 530 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 05/10/2007 in Complaint No. 15/1999 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. MRS. RANJIT NARULAThrough G.P.A. Sh. Jang Bahadur Singh Bindra, Resident of House No. 707, Secto...
Case Number: 530
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2013
GANGA DEVI & ANR. V/S HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. UPADHYAY & UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2964 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/06/2013 in Appeal No. 280/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BAY NO-49-52,S...
Case Number: 2964
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2013
PREM CHAND & 2 ORS. V/S HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. UPADHYAY & UPADHYAY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2965 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 24/06/2013 in Appeal No. 281/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA STATE CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING FEDERATION LTD.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BAY NO-49-52,S...
Case Number: 2965
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2013
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS. V/S RAMA NAND DHAKA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1569 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 02/04/2013 in Appeal No. 153/2008 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/2738/20131. RAMA NAND DHAKAS/O SHREE CHAND, R/O VILLAGE SERULI, P.O JAKHULISONEPATHARYAN...
Case Number: 1569
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-08-2013
MANJIT SINGH V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2481 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 26/03/2008 in Appeal No. 2158/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTDOperation Division, DHBVNL Tohana Tehsil TohanaFatehabad...
Case Number: 2481
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.