Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2956 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
LACHHI RAM V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate MS. JYOTI SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1246 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 12/03/2007 in Appeal No. 2761/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER O. P. SUB DIVISIO...
Case Number: 1246
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2013
RANDHIR V/S UTTARI HARYANA BIJLEE VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1740 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 09/01/2012 in Appeal No. 1755/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTARI HARYANA BIJLEE VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through its Sub Divisional Officer DivisionGohanaHaryan...
Case Number: 1740
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2013
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S KISHAN CHAND
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3329 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/06/2012 in Appeal No. 784/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KISHAN CHANDS/o Shri Mussaddi Lal R/o MohallaMahendergarhHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 3329
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2013
ABDUL V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4174 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1092/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, Sector-6PANCHKULAHAR...
Case Number: 4174
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2013
S.D.O. (OP), UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S NARESH KUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 133 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/08/2012 in Appeal No. 559/2011 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/246/2013,IA/247/20131. NARESH KUMARS/O SH RAGBHIR SINGH, R/O H.NO-1700/31 KAMLA NAGARROHT...
Case Number: 133
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2013
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 4 ORS. V/S RADHEY SHYAM MITTAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2447 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/03/2012 in Appeal No. 211/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RADHEY SHYAM MITTALS/o Late Shri Changa Mal Mittal R/o Mohalla Frashkhana, Mittal Gali NarnaulM...
Case Number: 2447
|
Date of Filing: 03-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2013
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S NARESH KUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JITENDRA JAIN & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3875 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 09/05/2011 in Appeal No. 1193/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NARESH KUMARS/o Sh Darshan kumar, R/o B Point City, Tohana FatehabadHaryana...........Petition...
Case Number: 3875
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2011
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2013
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S BALWINDER SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BHARAT SWAROOP SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2461 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/04/2012 in Appeal No. 686/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BALWINDER SINGHS/o Sh Gurdeep Singh R/o Village Shekpura SottarFatehabadHaryana...........Petit...
Case Number: 2461
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2013
Surinder Kumar Mittal V/S The State of Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. A.Sreenivas
Respondant Advocate
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/125/20131. The State of Haryana Chd. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERAs per office report no stay order or any other order has been received from the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Red...
Case Number: 125
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
OM PARKASH V/S UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL K. SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2968 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 29/04/2008 in Appeal No. 1021/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTDSub Divisional Officer O.P.Sub Division munak . KARNAL HAR...
Case Number: 2968
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 25-11-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.