Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2956 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
RAM CHANDER V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2828 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 22/01/2008 in Appeal No. 3335/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDSub Division City TohanaFatehabadHaryana...........P...
Case Number: 2828
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2014
DES RAJ V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2855 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 18/02/2008 in Appeal No. 3278/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED Operation Sub Division, DHBVNL, RaniaSirsaHaryana.....
Case Number: 2855
|
Date of Filing: 10-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2014
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM & ANR. V/S NARESH KUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ANIRUDH KUSH & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4226 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 29/07/2011 in Appeal No. 1926/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NARESH KUMARS/o Shri Karan Singh, R/o Village Natwal, tehsil, BarwalPanchkulaHaryana.............
Case Number: 4226
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2014
DAKSHIN HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S KANHIYA LAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P.C. THAKUR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3114 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 31/05/2012 in Appeal No. 629/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KANHIYA LALS/o Sh Bodan lal R/o nai basti, Rewari,tehsilRewariHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Ve...
Case Number: 3114
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 07-01-2014
HANS RAJ V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1107 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 11/07/2007 in Appeal No. 2715/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD THROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER O. P. SUB DIVISION, ...
Case Number: 1107
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2013
S.D.O. 'OP' DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S NATHA SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. BSK LEGAL
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2459 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 19/04/2011 in Appeal No. 1395/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NATHA SINGHS/o Sh Panja Singh, R/o Kutta Badh, SirsaHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. S....
Case Number: 2459
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2013
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CITY SUB DIVISION, UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S BRIJ KISHORE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AKSHAT GOEL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 60 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/08/2011 in Appeal No. 1906/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BRIJ KISHORER/o House No-68, Nyay Puri,Karnal - 132001Haryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. SU...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2013
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S SUKHDARSHAN SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. RITU PURI & MR. JARNAIL SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 800 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 22/07/2011 in Appeal No. 754/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUKHDARSHAN SINGHR/o Moyondkalan tehsiFatehabadHaryana...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN H...
Case Number: 800
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2013
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S MUKESH MALIK
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1092 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/10/2011 in Appeal No. 952/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MUKESH MALIKThrough its user M/s Pardhan Enterprsises, Through its Proprietor, Shri Ashish Prad...
Case Number: 1092
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2013
HARI RAM V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1245 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 18/12/2007 in Appeal No. 2658/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER O. P. SUB DIVISIO...
Case Number: 1245
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2013
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.