Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. RITESH KHATRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4027 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1993/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,Through its Chief Adminstrator, DISTRICT - PANCHKULAHARYAN...
Case Number: 4027
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. RITESH KHATRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4044 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1994/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, DISTRICT - PANCHKULA...
Case Number: 4044
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. RITESH KHATRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4045 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1995/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, DISTRICT - PANCHKULA...
Case Number: 4045
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.K.Umar
Respondant Advocate
Revision Petition No. RP/1/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. The State of HaryanaChd. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBERHON'ABLE MRS. PADMA PANDEY MEMBER PRESENT: ORDER      ...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. BHARAT SAWAROOP SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4108 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 10/07/2008 in Appeal No. 1326/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN LIMITEDRam Sarup Resident of village & Post Offfice Anwal Sub Tehsi...
Case Number: 4108
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR BISLA
Respondant Advocate MR. DINESH KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4585 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 26/07/2012 in Appeal No. 664/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHINI HARYANA BIJLI NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS.Through its Managing Director at HisarHISARHARYANA2. ...
Case Number: 4585
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR BISLA
Respondant Advocate MR. NARENDER SINGH YADAV
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4586 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 07/05/2012 in Appeal No. 470/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UATTER HARYANA BIJLI VATRAN NIGAM LTD. ANR.Through Managing Director, Shakti BhawanPANCHKULAHAR...
Case Number: 4586
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ASHOK KR. MISHRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3400 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 06/07/2011 in Appeal No. 751/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. JAI NARAINS/o Sh Jogi Ram, R/o Kirti Nagar, Bhiwani,TehsilbhiwaniHaryana...........Petitioner(s...
Case Number: 3400
|
Date of Filing: 12-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2826 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 16/04/2008 in Appeal No. 722/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDSub Division Mustafabad Yamuna NagarHaryana...........P...
Case Number: 2826
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2827 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 22/01/2008 in Appeal No. 3302/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDSub Division City Tohana FatehabadHaryana..............
Case Number: 2827
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.