Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2956 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
STATE OF HARYANA V/S GULSHAN JAIN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 338 OF 2013 IN RP/4832/20121. GULSHAN JAIN...........Appellants(s)Versus1. STATE OF HARYANA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. SURESH ...
Case Number: 338
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2014
STATE OF HARYANA & 2 ORS., V/S Shri NITIN MALIK & 52 ORS.,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. MADHU TEWATIA, Advocate,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2013 IN CC/296/20121. Shri NITIN MALIK & 52 ORS.,...........Appellants(s)Versus1. STATE OF HARYANA & 2 ORS.,...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBE...
Case Number: 360
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-02-2014
STATE OF HARYANA & 2 ORS. V/S SAVEENA & 9 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1264 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/12/2012 in Appeal No. 103/2007 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/2333/20131. SAVEENA & 9 ORS............Petitioner(s)Versus1. STATE OF HARYANA & 2 ORS......
Case Number: 1264
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2014
RAVINDER SINGH V/S HOUSING BOARD HARYANA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SALIL PAUL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 571 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/11/2012 in Appeal No. 33/2010 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1013/20131. HOUSING BOARD HARYANATHROUGH ITS SECRETARY,SECTOR-6PANCHKULAHARYANA..............
Case Number: 571
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2014
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR V/S INDRA GUPTA
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MOTISH KR. SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 506 OF 2013 IN RP/3522/20071. INDRA GUPTA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MRS. REKHA GUPTA, PRESIDING MEM...
Case Number: 506
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2014
SATYA NARAIN V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 16 OF 2014 IN RP/108/20131. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. SATYA NARAIN...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2014
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. V/S KANWAR SINGH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH K. MUDGAL
Respondant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 785 OF 2013 IN RP/2482-2483/20101. KANWAR SINGH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRES...
Case Number: 785
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2014
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM & ANR. V/S SURESH KUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. PAWAN SHARMA & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2427 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 17/12/2012 in Appeal No. 1249/2012 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/4025/20131. SURESH KUMARS/O SH BHARAT SINGH, R/O WADHWA RAM COLONY, TEHSIL CAMP, PANIPA...
Case Number: 2427
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
MOHAN LAL JAIN V/S HARYANA HOUSING BOARD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SALIL PAUL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI EXECUTION REVISION PETITION NO. 1 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 20/09/2013 in Appeal No. 72/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA HOUSING BOARDTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, SECTOR 6,PANCHKULAHARYANA...........Petitione...
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2014
LAKHWINDER KAUR V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. RITESH KHATRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4026 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/03/2012 in Appeal No. 1992/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.Through its Chief Adminstrator, DISTRICT - PANCHKULA...
Case Number: 4026
|
Date of Filing: 22-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.