Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2956 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Chief Administrator Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Prem Chand
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate sh. A.K. Nagpal
Respondant Advocate Sh. R.R. Sharma
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 321 of 2012 Date of instt.6.7.2012 Date of decision: 23.02.2015Prem Chand Saluja son of Shri J.R.Saluja resident of house no. 1531, Sector 13, Urban Estate, Karnal. ………..Complainant...
Case Number: 321
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2015
HARYANA ROADWAYS V/S V.P. SHARMA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/11/482(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/08/2011 in Case No. 454/09 of District North)1. V.P. SHARMAA-4/32 ORIENTAL ENCLAVE, INDRAPURASTHA EXTN. DELHI-92...........Appellant...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
S.D.O. UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S KHERDEEN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SURINDER KUMAR AHUJA & MR. SABAR ALI CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate MR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3568 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 22/07/2013 in Appeal No. 374/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KHERDEENS/O SH.IBHRAHIM R/O VILLAGE RANDAULI, TEHSIL INDRI, DISTRICT : KARNALHARYANA..............
Case Number: 3568
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-06-2014
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI V/S MOORDHWAJ YADAV
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANJU JAIN & MR. HITESH SACHAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1972 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 05/12/2011 in Appeal No. 1706/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MOORDHWAJ YADAVS/o Shri Chaturbhuj Yadav, R/o Village Behrampur,Tehsil & GurgaonHaryana..........
Case Number: 1972
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2014
HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. V/S M/S. SONA HOME PRODUCTS
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. KUSH CHATURVEDI & VIVEK JAIN
Respondant Advocate MR. RAVINDRA BANA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2467 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 21/02/2011 in Appeal No. 139/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. SONA HOME PRODUCTSS/o. Late Sh. S Late Jindal, 315, Indrustrial Area Phase- 2, Panchkula -...
Case Number: 2467
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 29-05-2014
SARDARE V/S UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate MR. ANIL HOODA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1649 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 25/02/2009 in Appeal No. 168/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Its Sub Divisional Office O.P. Sub Divisiona Sampl...
Case Number: 1649
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2014
BHIM SINGH V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate MR. BIPIN K. DWIVEDI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1749 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 04/12/2009 in Appeal No. 1617/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through Sub Divisional Officer, Operation City Sub Divi...
Case Number: 1749
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2014
BIR SINGH V/S DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate MR. K.C. BANSAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 721 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 26/11/2009 in Appeal No. 1370/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.Through its Sub Divisinal Officer, Operation Sub Divisio...
Case Number: 721
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2014
AMRIT BHATIA V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AJAY PAL, ADV.
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 235 OF 2014 IN RP/2491/20071. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ...........Appellants(s)Versus1. AMRIT BHATIA ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENTHON...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2014
BHAGWAN DASS V/S UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY SINGH
Respondant Advocate MR. SUNDER KHATRI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2842 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 28/07/2006 in Appeal No. 1045/2000 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. AND ORS.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER OPERATION SUB , DIVISION...
Case Number: 2842
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2006
|
Date of Upload: 09-05-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.