Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3026 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 04/06/2007 in Appeal No. 2513/2006 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTRI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDSUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (O.P) SUB DIVISION PIPLI,DISTRI...
Case Number: 3026
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2007
|
Date of Upload: 31-07-2014
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI EXECUTION REVISION PETITION NO. 43 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 19/05/2014 in Appeal No. 106/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. KAMLA DEVI & ANR.W/O SHRI RAMESH KUMAR MAHAJAN, R/O KOTHI NO-968,SECTOR-4PANCHKULAHARYA...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2014
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.S. Chauhan
Respondant Advocate Sh. G.S.Arora
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 571/111. Sh. Ram KumarKarnal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SDO Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited.Karnal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Subhash Chander Sharma MEMBER For the Complainant:Fo...
Case Number: 571
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 14-04-2015
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2110 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 15/03/2013 in Appeal No. 159/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. VIJAY KUMARH.NO-267,SECTOR-10PANCHKULAHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. HARYANA URBAN DEV...
Case Number: 2110
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-07-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. N.S. MALIK
Respondant Advocate Ms. Charu Sangwan
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3942 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 01/08/2011 in Appeal No. 978/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. GURDEV SINGH...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. & ANR........
Case Number: 3942
|
Date of Filing: 05-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2014
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Bhaje Singh, Sh. Rajesh Secy Krishana
Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. 83ex/2013In010/20101. Nirmala Kalyan W/o Rajinder KumarH.No. 101, Sec-7, U.E. Karnal...........Appellant(s)Versus1. The Krishna Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. 2 The Haryana State Cvooperative Housing Federation Ltd.Karnal. 2 Sco ...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2015
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.S. Sivia
Respondant Advocate Sh.R.K. Sharma
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 30 of 2011 Date of instt.17.01.2011 Date of decision: 09.03.2015Satish Kumar son of Shri Jagan Nath resident of House No.2012,Sector 13, Urban Estate, Karnal. ………..Complainant. Versu...
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND NAYAR
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 411 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 23/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1948/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS SUB DIVISION OFFICER O. P. SUB DIVISION, ...
Case Number: 411
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2008
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2014
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. Akush Gupta
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Sh. Bhajja Singh
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 598/20111. Raj Rani W/o Guljari LalH.NO. 302. Gandhi nagar, Gali NO. 7, Karnal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Mudra Co-op Housing Building Society, The Haryana State Co-Op Housing Federation Ltd.Hansi Road Karnal, Bays No. 49-52, Sec-2, Pa...
Case Number: 598
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. R.S. BADHRAN & MS. SUSHILA THAKRAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2700 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 20/05/2013 in Appeal No. 116/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. HARYANA TYRES & LUBRICANTSGALI NO-6 MEERUT ROAD,. THROUGH ITS PROP SH.SATISH KUMAR GUPTA, ...
Case Number: 2700
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-07-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.