Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2959 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Surender Singh
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Pawan Kumar Gahlyan
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajnish Dahiya
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 26-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2016
State of Haryana V/S Parvinder
Court Name: Sirsa
Appelant Advocate Comp
Respondant Advocate Gp Ajay kumar
Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. 130/14In1. Parvinder Mohalla namdhari rania tech Rania dist SirsaSirsaharyana...........Appellant(s)Versus1. State of HaryanaSub Divisinal SirsaSirsaharyana...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MRS. Gurpreet Kaur Gill PRESIDING MEMBERHO...
Case Number: 130
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2016
KRISHNA V/S STATE OF HARYANA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate GOVT.PLEADER
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 701 of 2015Date of Institution: 26.08.2015Date of Decision : 11.02.20161. State of Haryana through Collector, Rohtak.2. Sub Divisional Magistrate (Civil), Rohtak.3. District Social Welfare Officer, ...
Case Number: 701
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2016
P.D.GUPTA V/S HARYANA S.I. AND I. D. CORPORATION LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision:10.02.2016First Appeal No. 699/2009 (Arising out of the order dated 14.07.2009 passed in Complaint Case No. 280/2004 by the District Consumer Redressal Forum-VI, Barrac...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2016
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Ram Lal S/o Sewa Ram
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. Akush Gupta
Respondant Advocate Sh. D.S. Mann
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.362 of 2013 Date of instt.: 21.8.2013 Date of decision: 10.02.2016Ram Lal son of Shri Sewa Ram resident of house no.1925, Sector 13, Urban Estate, Karnal.. ……..Complainant. Vs.Haryana Urban...
Case Number: 362
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
STATE OF HARYANA V/S SAKINA
Court Name: Palwal
Appelant Advocate NASHIR KHAN
Respondant Advocate AUTH REP.
Case Number: 91
|
Date of Filing: 16-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2016
Govt Of Haryana V/S Rajbir
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate Virender Yadav
Respondant Advocate Ram Gopal
C.C. No. 26 of 2014Rajbir Vs Haryana State etc.Present:- None for the complainant.None for OP no. 1 and 3.Shri Mukesh Jangra, Advocate for OP no. 2. Case called several times since morning. It is now 2.20 p.m. This case is pending for filing of the written statement on behalf o...
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2016
Givt Of Haryana V/S Dhambir
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate Ram Singh
Respondant Advocate Ram Gopal
C.C. No. 30 of 2014Dharambir Vs Haryana State etc.Present:- None for the complainant.None for OP no. 1 and 3.Shri Mukesh Jangra, Advocate for OP no. 2. Case called several times since morning. It is now 2.20 p.m. This case is pending for filing of the written statement on behal...
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2016
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Sumitra Devi Wife of Omparkash
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate Ramesh Sangwan
Respondant Advocate
C.C. No. 288 of 2013Smt. Sumitra Devi Vs DHBVNL etc.Present:- None for the complainant.Shri K.R. Sangwan, Advocate for Ops. Case called several times since morning but none appeared on behalf of the complainant. It is now 2.30 p.m, case called again but none appeared on behalf ...
Case Number: 288
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2016
State of Haryana V/S Smt. Mishro Devi
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Gopal kardam
Respondant Advocate Vinod kumar
Case Number: 389
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.