Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2959 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Virender Singh S/o Daulat Ram
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate S.K. Rana
Respondant Advocate D.S. Mann
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Execution No.68 of 2012 Date of instt.: 9.5.2012 Date of decision: 31.3.2016Virender Singh son of Daulat Ram resident of village Salwan tehsil Assandh district Karnal.. ……..Decree Holder. Vs.Sub Divisi...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2016
Raj Kumar Sudan V/S Haryana Urban Development Authority through its Estate Officer,
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petition No. 87 of 2015 Date of Institution: 23.10.2015 Date of Decision: 30.03.2016Haryana Urban Development Authority through its Estate Officer, Hisar.Petitioner-Opposite PartyVersusRaj Kumar Sudan ...
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2016
Govt Of Haryana V/S Ram Sawrup
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate Virender Yadav
Respondant Advocate Ram Gopal
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 28/20141. Ram SawrupS/o VPo Dhani Mansukh, Teh Luhahru, Bhiwani...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Govt Of HaryanaBhiwani............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Jindal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Ansuya Bishnoi MEMBER For the Complainant:For ...
Case Number: 28
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2016
Govt of Haryana V/S Umed Singh
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate Virender Yadav
Respondant Advocate Ram Gopal
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 36/20141. Umed SinghS/o Eklash, VPO. Mansukh, Teh Luharu, Bhiwani...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Govt of HaryanaBhiwani............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Jindal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Ansuya Bishnoi MEMBER For the Complainant:Fo...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2016
STATE OF HARYANA & OTHERS V/S KARANDEEP SINGH.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate RAVI KANT.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Consumer Complaint No:282 of 2015Date of Institution:17.12.2015Date of Decision:22.03.2016Karandeep Singh s/o Sh.S.P.Singh, Flat No.101A, GHS 3, Sector-17, Panchkula. ….ComplainantVersusState of Haryana thr...
Case Number: 282
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2016
DHARMESH V/S HARYANA CYCLE CO.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate P.K.CHUGH
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 175 of 2016 Date of Institution: 26.02.2016 Date of Decision: 21.03.2016Haryana Cycle Company, Gokul Gate, Rewari, Tehsil, and District Rewari through its Proprietor. Appellant-ComplainantVers...
Case Number: 175
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2016
SDO Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Mahinder Singh S/o Keser Singh
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Rohit Sharma
Respondant Advocate Sh. G.S. Arora
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.304 of 2010 Date of instt.: 28.04.2010 Date of decision:17 .3.2016Mahinder Singh son of late Sh.Kesar Singh resident of village Dera Churni tehsil and District Karnal. ……..Complainant. Vs.S....
Case Number: 304
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2016
Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Ajit Singh S/o Mahna Singh
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. Pawan Sharma
Respondant Advocate D.S. Mann
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.901 of 2010 Date of instt.: 9.12.2010 Date of decision: 16.3.2016Ajit Singh son of Sh.Manha Singh resident of village Ramgarh tehsil Indri district Karnal through his LRs.i)Jasbir Kaur(widow) ii) SahabSing...
Case Number: 901
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2016
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Mrs. Madhu Gupta w/o Shri R.P. Gupta
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad.Consumer Complaint No. 132/2014.Date of Institution: 26.5.2014.Date of Order: 21.3.2016.Mrs. Madhu Gupta w/o Shri R.P. Gupta, 780/6, Mehrauli, New Delhi – 110 030. ……………….Compla...
Case Number: 132
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2016
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S SheelaDevi Widow of Rohtas
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate Harinder Kumar
Respondant Advocate r.s sharma
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. 421/20131. SheelaDevi Widow of RohtasMaanehru...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.Hissar............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Jindal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Ansuya Bishnoi MEMBER For the Complainant...
Case Number: 421
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.