Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sushil Kumar Gangra
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/16/1851. Shyam SunderAge-45 years Son of Sh. Dalip Singh R/o Village- Pawati Tehsil SamalkhaPanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S Haryana Agriculture ImplementsMain Road near Hero Agency Madlauda...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-01-2017
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate S.S. Saini
Respondant Advocate Deep Chand OP No.1,Rajiv Gupta OP No.2&3
Sumer Chand vs. Haryana Gramin Bank & others.CC No. 293 of 2015.Present: Sh. Sumer Chand complainant in person with counsel Sh. Surjit Singh Saini, Advocate. Sh. D.C.Singla, Advocate, counsel for OP No.1. Sh. Rajiv Gupta, Advocate, counsel for OPs No.2 & 3. File taken u...
Case Number: 293
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2016
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. First Appeal No.837 of 2014 Date of Institution: -09/22.09.2014Date of Decision: 14.12.2016Haryana Urban Development Authority through its Chief Administrator, Sector-6, Panchkula.The Estate Officer, HUDA, Sector-...
Case Number: 837
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Vishal Turan
Respondant Advocate Virender Sachdeva
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.227 of 2015 Date of instt.:22.09.2015 Date of decision:13.12.2016Jai Singh son of Shri Raghunath resident of village Bastara, Tehsil Gharaunda, District Karnal. ……..Complainant. Vs.Uttar ...
Case Number: 227
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-12-2016
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Anurag malik
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rishi Parkash
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 370/20141. Karan Singh Karan Singh S/o Sh. Molad Caste Jat Village Nindana Pana Tighari Teh Meham District Rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana Khad Beej BhandarHaryana Khad Beej Bha...
Case Number: 370
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2017
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Bhaskar Bhalla
Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Execution no.EA3 of 2016 Date of instt.:12.01.2016 Date of decision 08.12.2016Amrik Singh son of Shri Darshan Singh resident of Dera Guru Nanakpura, Nissing, Tehsil Nissing, District Karnal. ….…..Compla...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-IIU.T. ChandigarhFINAL ORDERComplaint Case No. CC/931/20161. Surinder Pal Singh House Bi, 558, Sector 1, New Delhi............Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana Seed Corporationchd............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN PRESI...
Case Number: 931
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-12-2016
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. Mukesh Sharma
Respondant Advocate P.S. Bhatti
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.199 of 2014 Date of instt.:18.07.2014 Date of decision:7.12.2016Shyam Sunder son of Shri Godha Ram, resident of House no.52, ward no.6, near Purana Kila, Indri, District Karnal. ……..Compla...
Case Number: 199
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2016
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Akash Gupta
Respondant Advocate Ashok Nagpal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint no. 82 of 2015 Date of instt.: 06.05.2015 Date of decision 07.12.20161.Surinder Singh son of Shri Partap Singh resident of VPO Uplana, Tehsil Assandh, District Karnal.2. Kulwant Singh son of Shri Jasbri Sin...
Case Number: 82
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
Court Name: Kurukshetra
Appelant Advocate Vivek Saini
Respondant Advocate R.K.Saini
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-01-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.