Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2938 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
HARYANA STATE INDUSTRTIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORP.LTD. AND ANR. V/S ALPINE SURGICAL AND PHARMACEUTICALS PVT.LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate YOGEDER MOHAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.128 of 2015Date of the Institution: 06.02.2015Date of Decision: 08.03.2017Alpine Surgical and Pharmaceuticals Private Limited Plot No.11, Sector-3, Growth Centre, Bawal through its Managing Director.A...
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2017
Estate officer Haryana Urban Development V/S The Nationalist Ex Servicemen Welfare Group Housing Sociery
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Narender Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 314
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2017
Prem Kumar V/S Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petitions No : 136 to 139 of 2016 Date of Institution: 23.12.2016 Date of Decision : 07.03.2017Revision Petition No.136 of 20161. Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, Panchkula.2...
Case Number: 136
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2017
Anil Kumar V/S Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, Panchkula
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Revision Petitions No : 136 to 139 of 2016 Date of Institution: 23.12.2016 Date of Decision : 07.03.2017Revision Petition No.136 of 20161. Chief Administrator, Haryana State Agriculture Marketing Board, Panchkula.2...
Case Number: 139
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2017
SURESH KUMAR CHAWLA V/S STATE OF HARYANA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate GOVT.PLEADER
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA,PANCHKULA First Appeal No.676 of 2016Date of Institution:21.07.2016 Date of Decision: 06.03.20171. Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Faridabad (East), Bikri Kar Bhawan, Sector 12, Faridabad, Haryana 121007.2. Excise &am...
Case Number: 676
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2017
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S M/s. Polly Packs
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2017
TIGHTWELL FASTNERS V/S HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORP.LTD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AJAY KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 693 of 2016Date of Institution: 27.07.2016Date of Decision : 03.03.20171. Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, Panchkula having its office at C-13 & C-1...
Case Number: 693
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2017
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Babli W/o Sunil
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Sant Dharamveer Chotivala
Respondant Advocate Yuvika
Case Number: 381
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2017
HARYANA SEEDS DEVELOPMENT CORP.LTD. V/S UHBVNL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B.D.BHATIA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 570 of 2016Date of Institution: 24.06.2016 Date of Decision: 27.02.20171. The Assistant Executive Engineer, OP, Sub Division, UHBVNL, Pipli, District Kurukshetra.2. The Executive Engineer, M &a...
Case Number: 570
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Smt. Santosh Devi W/o Ram Kumar
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Sudesh Rani
Respondant Advocate Harpal Arya
Case Number: 104
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.