Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. B.D. Bhatia, counsel for the Applicants/Appellants/Opposite Parties.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Miscellaneous Application No. 19 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 17.02.2017 Date of Decision: 29.03.20171. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigal Limited, having its H.O. at Vidyut Nagar, Hisar, through its Managing...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Miscellaneous Application No. 20 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 17.02.2017 Date of Decision: 29.03.20171. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigal Limited, having its H.O. at Vidyut Nagar, Hisar, through its Managing...
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Miscellaneous Application No. 23 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 17.02.2017 Date of Decision: 29.03.20171. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigal Limited, having its H.O. at Vidyut Nagar, Hisar, through its Managing...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Miscellaneous Application No. 26 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 17.02.2017 Date of Decision: 29.03.20171. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigal Limited, having its H.O. at Vidyut Nagar, Hisar, through its Managing...
Case Number: 26
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Miscellaneous Application No. 27 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 17.02.2017 Date of Decision: 29.03.20171. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigal Limited, having its H.O. at Vidyut Nagar, Hisar, through its Managing...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2017
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate M.L Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/145/20161. Mukesh KumarS/O Lala Ram R/O Thakar Basti FatehabadFatehabadHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Housing Board HaryanaPlot No. 6, Awas Bhawan Sector-6 PanchkulaPanchkulaHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Raghbir...
Case Number: 145
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. RAH ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate MR. B.C. BHATT
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 518 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 20/10/2015 in Appeal No. 545/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NARENDER PALS/O SH. PYARE LAL, VILL. KOTHAL KALAN, TEHSIL & DISTRICTMAHENDERGARHHARYANA............
Case Number: 518
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2017
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Shalender Singh
Respondant Advocate Anil Munjal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint no. 192 of 2015Date of instt.: 24.08.2015Date of decision 27.03.2017Amar Singh son of Shri Ram r/o Haibatpur, Tehsil Nilokheri, District Karnal. …..Complainant VersusS.D.O. (OP) Utri Haryana Bijli Vitra...
Case Number: 192
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. J.B. MUDGIL
Respondant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1856 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 06/05/2015 in Appeal No. 1026/2014 & 148/2007 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAJ KUMAR & 2 ORS.S/O SHADI LAL, HOUSE NO.136/22, SONIPAT ROAD,ROHTAKHARYANA2. RAME...
Case Number: 1856
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.