Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2938 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Haryana Seeds V/S Dalip Singh
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Jagat Singh
Respondant Advocate Gajraj singh
Case Number: 154
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2017
Haryana Seeds V/S Ashok Kumar
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. Jagat Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ram Avtar Yadav
Case Number: 155
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2017
MUKHTIAR SINGH V/S SDO, UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DILBAG SINGH,
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2427 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 02/09/2006 in Appeal No. 2659/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SDO, UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAMS.D O. OP. S/DIV. UHBVNL . KALAYAT . , DISTRICT KAITHAL ...
Case Number: 2427
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2017
Estate officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Sumit Mittal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. R.D. Bali
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/16/541. Sumit MittalAge-41 Years Son of Sh. K.P. Mittal R/O House No. 1375, Sector-6, Urban Estate, KarnalKarnalHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Estate officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority(HUDA...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2017
Haryana Urban Dovelopment,Authority V/S Ram Mehar Singh Borwal S/o Shri Kaliya Borwal
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate Manoj Kumar Rai
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 297
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Parveen Kumar R/o Shri Ganga ram
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Suman lata W/o B.K. Gupta
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Lajpat Rai Chuchra
Respondant Advocate R.R. Sharma
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.139 of 2013 Date of instt.: 13.3.2013 Date of decision:15.03.2017Smt. Suman Lata wife of Shri B.K.Gupta, resident of house no.779, Sector-6, Urban Estate, Karnal. ……..Complainant. Vs.1...
Case Number: 139
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
KAZANA RAM@KAZANA V/S UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 528 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 14/07/2016 in Appeal No. 1072/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITEDTHROUGH ITS SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KALAYAT, DISTRICT-K...
Case Number: 528
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2017
Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Suresh Kumar S/o Hem raj
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Bal Kishan
Respondant Advocate Sanjiv Kamboj
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.451 of 2013 Date of instt.: 12.11.2013 Date of decision:14.03.2017Suresh Kumar son of Shri Hem Raj resident of village Kalri Jagir Tehsil and District Karnal. ……..Complainant. Vs.Sub Divi...
Case Number: 451
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2017
General Manager Haryana Roadways Sonepat Depot V/S Sunita
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate Anil Sharma
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.CC/321 of 2016Instituted on: 16.08.2016 Date of order: 10.03.2017Sunita wife of RaRanbir Singh, resident of village Jauli, Tehsil Gohana, District Sonipat. …ComplainantVersusGeneral Manager, Harya...
Case Number: 321
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.