company-name-logo

Haryana

Latest Judgments

Total 2938 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Mohinder Saini Advocate

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate MOhinder Singh Saini

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 147

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 21-04-2017

NCDRC

JASWANT SINGH V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA

Respondant Advocate MR. MANISH KR RAMPAL

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3166 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 18/12/2015 in Appeal No. 725/2015 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYSECTOR 6, PANCHKULAHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. J...

Case Number: 3166

|

Date of Filing: 08-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 19-04-2017

Haryana

Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Raghubir Singh S/o Ram Dhari

Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Des Raj Goyal

Respondant Advocate Sudhakar Mittal

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.67 of 2014 Date of instt.:14.03.2014 Date of decision 10.4.2017Raghubir Singh son of Ram Dhari resident of House no.32, Gali no.1 Shiv Colony Kaithal Road, Karnal. ……..Complainant. Vs.1.T...

Case Number: 67

|

Date of Filing: 18-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2017

Madhya Pradesh

Honda motorcycle and scooter india pvt. ltd. haryana V/S Shireesh Chandra Dubey

Scooter   Honda   Haryana  

Court Name: Hoshangabad

Appelant Advocate Vinod Tomar

Respondant Advocate k.k.parasar

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 19-04-2017

Haryana

SDO Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Maha Singh S/o Phool Singh

Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Sh. B.S. Kashyap

Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajesh Sharma

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.361 of 2013 Date of instt.: 19.08.2013 Date of decision 6.4.2013Maha Singh son of Shri Phool Singh caste Jat resident of Sheikhpura Jagir Tehsil and District Karnal. …………...

Case Number: 361

|

Date of Filing: 21-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2017

Haryana

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Mamta

Haryana  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate Narender Khatri

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 418

|

Date of Filing: 14-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 10-04-2017

Chandigarh

The New India Assurance Company Ltd., V/S M/s Haryana Dairy Farms

The New India Assurance   New India Assurance   Haryana  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Devinder Kumar Adv.

Respondant Advocate Kapil Gupta,Adv

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:493/2016Date of Institution:15.07.2016Date of Decision:03/04/2017 M/s Haryana Dairy Farms, Village Dehri, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala through its Partner Sh.Sharad K.Gupta. ... Complainant....

Case Number: 493

|

Date of Filing: 15-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2017

Haryana

Case Number: 245

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2017

Haryana

State of Haryana V/S Shikha D/o Ram Kanwar

Haryana  

Court Name: Sonipat

Appelant Advocate Ram Mehar Singh

Respondant Advocate Nikhil

Case Number: 454

|

Date of Filing: 09-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 05-04-2017

Haryana

M/s Chawla Stone Crusher V/S Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigal Limited

Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. B.D. Bhatia, counsel for the Applicants/Appellants/Opposite Parties.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA Miscellaneous Application No. 19 of 2017 Date of the Institution: 17.02.2017 Date of Decision: 29.03.20171. Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigal Limited, having its H.O. at Vidyut Nagar, Hisar, through its Managing...

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 17-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 18-04-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.