Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Suresh Khanna
Respondant Advocate Vineet Rathore
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K L Saini, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.:179 of 2017Date of Institution:30.06.2017Date of Decision:04.07.2017Ashok Kumar Parjapat, resident of Village Mohla, Tehsil Hansi, District Hissar (Haryana).……Appellant/ComplainantV e r s ...
Case Number: 179
|
Date of Filing: 30-06-2017
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2017
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Saraj Bala
Respondant Advocate Yashbir Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint No.. 66 of 2015Date of instt . 09.04.2015Date of decision 03.07.2017Vinod Jain s/o Sh. Narumal Jain r/o House No.48, Sector-14, U.E. Karnal. ……….Complainant.Versus1. The Chief Administrat...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-07-2017
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sameer Gambhir
Respondant Advocate Sh. Ajay Gandhi
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/15/181. Romesh VigRomesh Vig s/o Sita Ram r/o VIG houseno. 940/22, Sonepat Road, Near Jagmohan Motors, Rohtak. RohtakHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2017
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/266/20161. Raj KumarS/O Hari Chand R/O Nehar Colony FatehabadFatehabadHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Govt. Of HaryanaCollector FatehabadFatehabadHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Raghbir Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. A...
Case Number: 266
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 232 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Udey Singh son of Shri Chandgi Ram, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Compla...
Case Number: 232
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 233 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Bhagwan Singh son of Shri Chandgi Ram, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Com...
Case Number: 233
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 234 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Vijay Kumar son of Shri Sheopal, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Complaina...
Case Number: 234
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 235 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Umed Singh son of Shri Iklas, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-ComplainantV...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 236 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Mann Singh son of Shri Ishwar, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Complainant...
Case Number: 236
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.