company-name-logo

Haryana

Latest Judgments

Total 2959 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.

Haryana

Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Smt. Kailash Kumari W/o Sh. Naresh KUmar

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Suresh Khanna

Respondant Advocate Vineet Rathore

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 11-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 10-08-2017

Chandigarh

Director, Haryana State Roadways V/S Ashok Kumar Parjapat

Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate K L Saini, Adv.

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.:179 of 2017Date of Institution:30.06.2017Date of Decision:04.07.2017Ashok Kumar Parjapat, resident of Village Mohla, Tehsil Hansi, District Hissar (Haryana).……Appellant/ComplainantV e r s ...

Case Number: 179

|

Date of Filing: 30-06-2017

|

Date of Upload: 20-07-2017

Haryana

Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Vinod Jain S/o Narumal Jain

Development Authority   Haryana Urban Development Authority   Haryana  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Saraj Bala

Respondant Advocate Yashbir Singh

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint No.. 66 of 2015Date of instt . 09.04.2015Date of decision 03.07.2017Vinod Jain s/o Sh. Narumal Jain r/o House No.48, Sector-14, U.E. Karnal. ……….Complainant.Versus1. The Chief Administrat...

Case Number: 66

|

Date of Filing: 09-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 18-07-2017

Haryana

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Romesh Vig

Haryana  

Court Name: Rohtak

Appelant Advocate Sh. Sameer Gambhir

Respondant Advocate Sh. Ajay Gandhi

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/15/181. Romesh VigRomesh Vig s/o Sita Ram r/o VIG houseno. 940/22, Sonepat Road, Near Jagmohan Motors, Rohtak. RohtakHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam ...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 15-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 02-08-2017

Haryana

Govt. Of Haryana V/S Raj Kumar

Haryana  

Court Name: Fatehabad

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/266/20161. Raj KumarS/O Hari Chand R/O Nehar Colony FatehabadFatehabadHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Govt. Of HaryanaCollector FatehabadFatehabadHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Raghbir Singh PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. A...

Case Number: 266

|

Date of Filing: 17-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 04-07-2017

Haryana

STATE OF HARYANA V/S UDEY SINGH

Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 232 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Udey Singh son of Shri Chandgi Ram, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Compla...

Case Number: 232

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-06-2017

Haryana

STATE OF HARYANA V/S BHAGWAN SINGH

Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 233 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Bhagwan Singh son of Shri Chandgi Ram, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Com...

Case Number: 233

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-06-2017

Haryana

STATEOF HARYANA V/S VIJAY KUMAR

Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 234 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Vijay Kumar son of Shri Sheopal, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Complaina...

Case Number: 234

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-06-2017

Haryana

STATE OF HARYANA V/S UMED SINGH

Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 235 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Umed Singh son of Shri Iklas, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-ComplainantV...

Case Number: 235

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-06-2017

Haryana

STATE OF HARYANA V/S MANN SINGH

Haryana  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 236 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Mann Singh son of Shri Ishwar, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Complainant...

Case Number: 236

|

Date of Filing: 06-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 30-06-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.