Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2938 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
STATE OF HARYANA V/S DHARAMBIR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 238 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Dharambir son of Shri Richhpal, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Complainan...
Case Number: 238
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
STATE OF HARYANA V/S BHARAT SINGH
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 239 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Bharat Singh son of Shri Swarupa, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Complain...
Case Number: 239
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
STATE OF HARYANA V/S SATBIR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 240 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Satbir son of Shri Chandgi Ram, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-Complainan...
Case Number: 240
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
STATE OF HARYANA V/S RAJBIR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT SHEORAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 241 of 2017Date of Institution: 06.03.2017Date of Decision: 23.06.2017Rajbir son of Shri Iklas, resident of Village Dhani Mansukh, Tehsil Loharu, District Bhiwani.….Appellant-ComplainantVersu...
Case Number: 241
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
State Of Haryana V/S Salochana
Court Name: Hisar
Appelant Advocate Sushil Sharma
Respondant Advocate Rajesh Jain/ In Person
Case Number: 104
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2017
Haryana Rajya Parivahan Nigam V/S Ashok Kumar Prajpat
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint No.. 395 of 2016Date of instt. 27.12.2016Date of decision 19.06.2017Ashok Kumar Parjapat, resident of Village-Mohalla, District- Hisar (Haryana)-160017,…………ComplainantVersus1. Commi...
Case Number: 395
|
Date of Filing: 27-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2017
UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITREAN NIGAM LTD. V/S BALWINDER SINGH
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate SANJEEV KUMAR.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Consumer Complaint No.:210 of 2016Date of Institution:11.08.2016Date of Decision:14.06.2017Balwinder Singh s/o Sh.Baldev Singh, aged 45 years, permanent R/o House No.276, Defence Colony, Ambala Cantt.2nd Address:-Ho...
Case Number: 210
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2017
Dakshini Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Parmila Devi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parmod Parmar, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Ms. Alka Joshi, Adv.
Dated: 12/6/2017ORDER In terms of order passed by us on 01.06.2017, cheque for an amount of Rs.24,84,000/- has been returned in original to Sh.Pramod Kumar, SDO, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam, Pataudi. Photocopy of the aforesaid cheque has been retained on file. Today, all ...
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-06-2017
Haryana Roadways V/S Sanjay
Court Name: Bhiwani
Appelant Advocate surender singh
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/68/2017( Date of Filing : 27 Apr 2017 )1. SanjaySon of Mahender Vpo Devsar ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana RoadwaysBhiwani Deopat.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Manjit Singh Naryal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Saroj bala Bohra...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 26-07-2019
Online Clues Spark International, Haryana V/S Naresh Reddy U
Court Name: Bellary
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.