Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2938 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Sh. Rajinder Kumar Mahajan
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Amarbir Dhaliwal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CC/650/2017Rajinder Kumar Mahajan & Anr. Vs Haryana Urban Development Authority & Ors. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Amarbir Dhaliwal, Counsel for Complainants....
Case Number: 650
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2017
The United India Insurance Company Ltd., V/S M/s Haryana Dairy Farms
United India Insurance Haryana
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Devinder Kumar Adv.
Respondant Advocate Satpal Dhamija,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:126/2017Date of Institution:06.02.2017Date of Decision:12.09.2017 M/s Haryana Dairy Farms, Village Dehri, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala through its Partner Sh.Sharad K.Gupta. ... Complainant....
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2017
The United India Insurance Company Ltd., V/S M/s Haryana Dairy Farms
United India Insurance Haryana
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Devinder Kumar Adv.
Respondant Advocate Satpal DhamjiaAdv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:127/2017Date of Institution:06.02.2017Date of Decision:12.09.2017 M/s Haryana Dairy Farms, Village Dehri, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala through its Partner Sh.Sharad K.Gupta. ... Complainant....
Case Number: 127
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2017
HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD V/S KRISHAN LAL CHHABRA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAJESH NARANG
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.464 of 2017 Date of Institution: 21.08.2017 Date of Decision: 12.09.2017Sh. Krishan Lal Chhabra S/o Sh.Om Parkash R/o H.No.298, Sayeed Wada, Old Faridabad, Faridabad.…..Appellant VERSUSChief Ad...
Case Number: 464
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2018
Haryana Urban Devlopment Authority V/S Sukhdev Singh
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2017
HARYANA STATE TRANSPORT V/S ASHOK KUMAR PARJAPAT
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No. 901 of 2017Date of Institution: 31.07.2017Date of Decision: 08.09.2017Ashok Kumar Parjapat, resident of Village Mohalla, District Hisar -160017.Appellant-ComplainantVersus1. Commissioner, Haryana S...
Case Number: 901
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-10-2017
General Manager Haryana Roadways Sonepat Depot V/S Jai Dayal
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 256
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2017
Max Life Insurance Co ltd Haryana Bhart & Other V/S Shrimati Krishna Shrivastava
Max Life Insurance Life Insurance Life Insurance Haryana Max
Court Name: Basti
Appelant Advocate virendra nath pandey
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-10-2017
Estate Officer, Haryana Development Authority V/S Mohinder Singh S/o Sohan Singh
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Vineet Dogra
Respondant Advocate Chanbbir Mandhan
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.276 of 2014 Date of instt. 01.10.2014 Date of decision:07.09.2017Mohinder Singh son of late Shri Sohan Singh, resident of SCF no.31, Sector 13, Urban Estate, Karnal. ………….C...
Case Number: 276
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2017
SDO, Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Kul Bhushan Rai Chuchra S/o Ram Kishan
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Rajbir Sharma
Case Number: 303
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.