Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2938 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Haryana Roadways V/S Shakti Singh Khatri
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Dalbir Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2017
Uttar Haryana Bijle Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Puran Chand
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sunil Dutt Sharma
Respondant Advocate Vikash Yadav
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2017
Serve Haryana Gramin Bank V/S Lilu Ram
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. Yudhbir Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 102
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-10-2017
The Managing Director, Maruthi India Pvt Ltd, Service Division, Palam Gurgaon Road, Gurgaon, Haryana V/S Sunil Dath, S/o. Ali, Aged 42 years, Muneer Nivas, Puthenkunnu Post, Sulthan Bathery
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION ,KALPETTAWAYANAD-673122PHONE 04936-202755Complaint Case No. CC/282/20161. Sunil Dath, S/o. Ali, Aged 42 years, Muneer Nivas, Puthenkunnu Post, Sulthan BatherySulthan BatheryWayanadKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Managing ...
Case Number: 282
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2017
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd V/S Braham Dutt
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Surinder Kumar
Respondant Advocate Bhavishag Sohni
Case Number: 207
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2017
Estate Officer Haryana V/S Kirshan Kumar
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/78/20171. Kirshan KumarS/O Prithvi Singh Address Chamber No. 46 Court Complex FatehabadFatehabadHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Estate Officer HaryanaVikash Pradhikarn HisarHisarHaryana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Ragh...
Case Number: 78
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2017
Haryana Urban Development Authority Panipat V/S Som Nath
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/16/1041. Som NathSon of Sh. Jogi Ram Age about 55 years R/O Devi Lal Colony Sector-12, HUDA, PanipatPanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana Urban Development Authority PanipatSector 13-17, Pani...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2018
Estate officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority Panipat V/S Satpal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/16/1051. SatpalSon of Sh. Ram Rattan Age about 55 years R/o Devi Lal Colony, Sector-12, HUDA, Panipat.PanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Estate officer, Haryana Urban Development Authority Panipat...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Raj Singh Dabas S/o Ram Singh
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate B.M. Sehgal
Respondant Advocate Amarjeet Singh
Case Number: 93
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2017
Estate Officer Haryana Urban Devlopment V/S Sushil Kumar
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate N.S Malik
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/35/20171. Sushil KumarS/O Subash Chand C/O Hanuman Sanitary and Marble House Railway Road TohanaFatehabadHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Estate Officer Haryana Urban DevlopmentSector-13, Huda Complex hisarHisarHaryana............Opp....
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-11-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.