Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2959 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd V/S Dilbagh Singh
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Kapoor
Respondant Advocate Virender Sachdeva
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint No.. 238 of 2017Date of instt. 25.07.2017Date of decision 08.02.2018Dilbagh Singh age 37 years son of Sh. Ram Kishan resident of village Pakka Khera, Teshil & District Karnal.………&helli...
Case Number: 238
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2018
JAGDEV SINGH & 5 ORS. V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUBHA AGRAWAL
Respondant Advocate MR. DEEPAK AGGARWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 714 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 08/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1060/2009 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH ITS CHIEF ADMINSTRATOR, SECTOR-6PANCHKULAHARY...
Case Number: 714
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2018
SDO Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Munishwer Dayal S/o Yogeshwar Dayal
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate R.D. Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 337
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2018
S.D.O.(OP) Sub Division, Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Gurmeet Singh
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Manjeet Kamboj
Respondant Advocate Bhanu Partap Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.Complaint No.. 16 of 2018Date of instt. 11.01.2018Date of decision 02.02.2018Gurmeet Singh, aged 41 years, son of Shri Gurbaksh Singh, resident of Village Dachar, Teshil Nissing, Distt. Karnal.………&h...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2018
Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank V/S Ranbir Singh
Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank Haryana
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. Kuber Singh
Respondant Advocate Sh. V.S. Yadav
Case Number: 199
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-02-2018
Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited & Others V/S Ami Chand S/o Uday Ram
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate Kuldip Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 374
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2018
Director General, Haryana State Transport V/S Ashok Kumar Prajapat
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:908 of 2017Date of Institution:30.11.2017Date of Decision:25.01.2018Ashok Kumar Parjapat R/o Village Mohalla, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar (Haryana) 125042. …..ComplainantsVersus1] Di...
Case Number: 908
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2018
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Sh. Rajinder Kumar Mahajan
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Amarbir Dhaliwal Adv.
Respondant Advocate
The Accounts Officer of HUDA states that the HUDA has complied with the order and he has placed on record a copy of RE-allotment letter. He further states that the complainant has given a letter that he will not claim Rs.2000/- per day as ordered by this Forum if the house is tra...
Case Number: 217
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-02-2018
Haryana Gramin Bank V/S Babita Devi
Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Varun Grewal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2018
Uttari Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited V/S Krishana Kumari W/o Tara Chand
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate R.K.Dankher
Respondant Advocate Manoj Kumar Sachdeva
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.90 of 2016 Date of instt. 21.03.2016 Date of decision:19.01.2018Krishna Kumari aged 64 years wife of Shri Tara Chand, resident of House no.66, Sector-13, U.E. Karnal. …….Complainant. ...
Case Number: 90
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 25-01-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.