Haryana
Latest Judgments
Total 2938 Consumer Court Cases Against Haryana.
Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Raj Kumar S/o Girdhari Lal
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Bhagat Singh
Respondant Advocate Rajbir Singh
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2018
Director, Haryana State Roadways V/S Ashok Kumar Parjapat
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHAppeal No.308 of 2017Date of Institution12.12.2017Date of Decision04.01.2018Ashok Kumar Parjapat R/o Village Mohalla, Tehsil Hansi, District Hisar (Haryana) 125042. ....Appellant/ComplainantVersusDirector, H...
Case Number: 308
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2018
The Chief Administrator, Haryana Urban Development Authority V/S Kapur Singh
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Vinod Dogra
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.420 of 2017 Date of instt. 18.12.2017 Date of decision:4.1.2018Kapur Singh son of Shri Tek Singh, resident of House no.479, Sector-13, Urban Estate, Kurukshetra. …….Complainant. Versus...
Case Number: 420
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-01-2018
DLF Pramerica Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Gurgaon, Haryana V/S Md. Tahir Ansari
Dlf Pramerica Life Insurance Life Insurance Life Insurance Haryana
Court Name: Sundargarh
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 52
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-01-2018
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V/S M/s Haryana Dairy Farms
The New India Assurance New India Assurance Haryana
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Devinder Kumar
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 134 OF 2017in CC/185/2016Haryana Dairy FarmVs New India Assurance Co. Ltd.BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER RAVINDER SINGH, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Devinder Kumar, Counsel for Complainant/DH.S...
Case Number: 134
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2017
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Sharda Devi
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sushil Gaur
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPANIPATComplaint Case No. CC/17/3101. Sharda DeviAge about 30 years wife of Surender R/o Madlauda, near Old Petrol Pump, Madlauda Tehsil Madlauda.PanipatHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.Shakti ...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2018
M/s Haryana Electronics V/S Shri Bala Ji Computers
Court Name: Rewari
Appelant Advocate Sh. Nitin Verma
Respondant Advocate Sh. Harinder Singh
Case Number: 291
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-12-2017
Utter Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Rajender
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. R.P. Kaushik
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-03-2018
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Sultan Singh S/o Chamel Singh
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Amit Kumar
Respondant Advocate B.P. Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No. 212 of 2015 Date of instt. 10.9.2015 Date of decision 11.12.2017Sultan Singh aged about 57 years son of Shri Chamel Singh resident of village Nali Khurd Tehsil and District Karnal. ……..C...
Case Number: 212
|
Date of Filing: 10-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2017
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. V/S Ranbir Singh
Court Name: Panipat
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ajit Singh Dahiya
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.