Court Name: Jhajjar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sanjay Jakhar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2018
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIVEK GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 517 OF 2018(Against the Order dated 22/08/2017 in Appeal No. 373/2016 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.GURGAON ESTATE OFFICER, GURUGAMHARYANA2. HARYANA URBAN...
Case Number: 517
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2018
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate GOVT.PLEADER
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 528 of 2017Date of Institution: 03.05.2017Date of Decision : 20.02.20181. State of Haryana through Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad.2. Commissioner-cum-Director General School Education Haryana, Siksh...
Case Number: 528
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate GOVT.PLEADER
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 529 of 2017Date of Institution: 03.05.2017Date of Decision : 20.02.20181. State of Haryana through Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad.2. Commissioner-cum-Director General School Education Haryana, Siksh...
Case Number: 529
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2018
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate S.K. Malhotra
Respondant Advocate Bhanu Partap Singh
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.15 of 2017 Date of instt. 12.01.2017 Date of decision: 16.2.2018Smt. Meena Sahni, age 70 years, wife of Shri Anil Kumar Sahni, Advocate, resident of House no.4, Minor Road, Karnal. …….Co...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2018
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Birbal Sohal
Respondant Advocate Sh. Dinesh Clerck
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 467/2017( Date of Filing : 16 Aug 2017 )1. Ashok Kumar Parjapat R/o Mohalla, District Hisar Haryana............Complainant(s)Versus1. Haryana RoadwaysHaryana Roadways 30 Byas Bhawan, Sector 17, ...
Case Number: 467
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2018
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Vivek Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate Sh. K.K. Luthra
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rohtak.Rohtak, Haryana. Complaint Case No. 295/2017( Date of Filing : 15 May 2017 )1. Ashok S/o Umed Singh R/o Village Dattaur, rohtak............Complainant(s)Versus1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.Rohtak through SDO OP Sun-Divis...
Case Number: 295
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2018
Court Name: Mahendragarh
Appelant Advocate RA Sain
Respondant Advocate JK Yadav
Case Number: 238
|
Date of Filing: 24-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2018
Development Authority Haryana Urban Development Authority Haryana
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NIRVIKAR VERMA
Respondant Advocate MR. GAJENDER SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3118 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 01/06/2017 in Appeal No. 12/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAT HUDA, SECTOR 13, HISAR HARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Vers...
Case Number: 3118
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2018
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Naveen Kumar
Respondant Advocate Amit Munjal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.181 of 2016 Date of instt. 03.06.2016 Date of decision:8.2.2018Kashi Ram son of Sadhu Ram, resident of VPO Biana Tehsil Indri, District Karnal. …….Complainant Versus1.Executive Enginee...
Case Number: 181
|
Date of Filing: 03-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-02-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Haryana in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Haryana ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Haryana under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.